Categories
Letters

Letter to the Orthodox Times

The following letter is in response to your article falsely accusing Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov of “attacking” Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople.This is an absolutely false allegation. The reality is that the American Department of State has intervened blatantly in ecclesiastical matters and has created a catastrophic schism in the Orthodox Church. As a Greek American I am outraged by the intervention of people such as outgoing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and “Ambassador” Geoffrey Pyatt in the affairs of the Orthodox Church.


This collusion between the Ecumenical Patriarchate and certain Bishops in the Churches of Greece and Cyprus with the State Department has contributed to the spiritual decline of these three Greek speaking Churches. The primary foreign policy aim of the American government is to isolate and contain Russia which is the last real bastion of Orthodox Christianity in the world. Russia is the Orthodox country that proceeded to save the Christians of Syria from genocide which resulted from the American Crusades in the Middle East. Russia is the Orthodox country that has blocked the neopagan gay, lesbian, and transgender ideology from being imposed (by western backed think tanks) on its territory.


On the matter of Ukraine, it was always the position of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and all Orthodox Churches that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under Moscow was the authentic canonical Church. This stance did not change until the State Department meddled in Church affairs in 2018 and the Churches of Greece and Cyprus likewise refrained from entering into communion with Ukrainian schismatics until American officials all of whom are secularists or belong to certain Protestant heretical groups lobbied them to recognize the schismatics. 


The Russian Foreign Minister did not “attack” the Ecumenical Patriarch. He told the truth about Patriarch Bartholomew’s stance toward the Orthodox world. By tradition and by the teaching of Orthodox ecclesiology Patriarch Bartholomew is “first among equals” and holds a “primacy of honor” in the Orthodox Church. He is not an Eastern Pope and does not have the right to intervene in the internal affairs of any autocephalous Orthodox Churches. What he has done in Ukraine has violated canon law by attempting to restore”bishops” who were lawfully deposed by their own synods and has attempted to grab ecclesiastical territory (Ukraine) that has been part of the Russian Orthodox Church since 1686. 


 As a Greek, I also happen to love the city of Constantinople and the Great Church itself. However, I follow the example of Saint Mark of Ephesus who rejected the decisions of the Emperor John Paleologos and the Bishops of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in 1439 after they accepted the heretical decisions of the Council of Florence. The Orthodox Church has as its eternal leader the incarnate logos and word of God Jesus Christ! The Orthodox Church functions through the process of conciliarity in which the highest decision making authority emanates from an Ecumenical Council in which all Bishops from all local Churches convene to reach decisions.


Patriarch Bartholomew’s intervention in Ukraine undermines the conciliar tradition of the Orthodox Church at the behest of the atheist and heretical officials of the American State Department. Making this ecclesiastical crisis even worse is the violent persecution of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church by the Ukrainian Government and by various Neo-Nazi and anti semetic militias and groups in Ukraine. The Greek Patriarchs of Constantinople and Alexandria and those Bishops in Greece and Cyprus who have entered into communion with defrocked Ukrainian shysters and unordained crackpots have committed serious ecclesiastical crimes against the Church of  Christ!


It is time for the Greek speaking world to come out of the slumber that it has been in since 2018 and to recognize that the State Department is using the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Greek Churches as if they were political parties or non governmental organizations. The Ukrainian affair has to do with proper ecclesiology and canon law, with the validity or non validity of the consecration of Bishops and the ordinations of Priests. These are matters that American officials have no business discussing or commenting on. 


Those Greeks who support Patriarch Bartholomew in his Ukrainian venture are in fact undermining the Ecumenical Patriarchate. As one who is under the omophorion of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and who has authored a book about its glorious history and has been active in raising awareness of its plight in Turkey, I say that I am against the activities of Patriarch Bartholomew in Ukraine. These activities and claims of supreme authority have destabilized and undermined the Church of Constantinople and its place in the Orthodox Church. Those who love and appreciate the great spiritual heritage of Constantinople are obligated to speak against the betrayal of this heritage by what is occurring in Ukraine. 


I conclude my letter by recalling the great irony in this entire affair. The State Department hypocritically claims to be protecting the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Anyone familiar with the history of the Church of Constantinople is aware of the fact that in the aftermath of the anti Greek pogroms of 1955  and the ethnic cleansing of Greeks from Constantinople and the islands of Imbros and Tenedos during the 1960’s surely recalls that the State Department refused to condemn or protest the atrocities against the Greek Orthodox population by the Turkish authorities. It should also be recalled that Archbishop Spyridon of Athens bravely condemned the Turkish government and the American and British governments for their passivity in the aftermath of the 1955 pogroms despite enormous pressure from the Greek Government and the American Embassy to keep silent. 


The Ecumenical Patriarchate’s strength has been spiritual, not political. Its strength throughout the hardships of the twentieth century emanated from its spiritual ties with its sister Orthodox Churches. As a result of Constantinople’s unwise and uncanonical invasion of the territory of the Russian Church in Ukraine it has cut itself off from the Russian Church and badly strained its relations with the other local Orthodox Churches. 


By harming the canonical and spiritual unity of the Orthodox Church through its invasion of Ukraine, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has also harmed itself by damaging the spiritual foundations upon which it was founded  and which has enabled the Great Church to survive since 1453. 

             Theodore G. Karakostas 

Categories
political

Imia Twenty five Years Later

January 31 will be the twenty fifth anniversary of the notorious Imia affair. Imia is the name of a Greek islet in the Aegean Sea that Turkey claimed. The Treaty of Peace with Italy that was signed in 1947 gave the Dodecanese islands along with all islets in the Aegean Sea to Greece. There is no question that Imia is a Greek islet.

Despite historic treaties and maps affirming Imia as Greek, Athens was pressured by the United States government to withdraw the Greek flag from Imia. This was a major defeat and setback for Greece and a victory for Turkey. It should be remembered that it was the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton that neutralized Greek sovereignty over Imia.

Over the past half a year or so, Turkish aggression has been manifested against Greece and Cyprus. Turkey challenges Greek sovereignty in the eastern mediterranean and claims outright several Greek islands that belong to Athens according to international treaties and are populated by ethnic Greeks. There are two factors in the year 2020 that were different from 1996.

The first difference was that the internationalist Prime Minister Costas Simitis and his PASOK party are gone from the political scene. Simitis was an anti Greek Prime Minister that was more interested in being European. Greece today is led by New Democracy leader Kyriakos Mitsotakis who has proven to be more of a nationalist and is more committed to the defense of Greece than Simitis was.

The second difference between 2020 and 1996 is the difference between the Trump and the Clinton administrations. In 1996, Undersecretary of State Richard Holbrooke “negotiated” between Greece and Turkey. In reality, he pressured Greece to back down and the Greek flag came down from Imia.

In 2020, the Greek Government under the leadership of Mitsotakis stood up to the Turks and has refused to give away Greece’s sovereign rights. There is no evidence that the Trump administration in any way attempted to bully Greece into making concessions to the Turks.

Just something for Greeks to consider carefully before the inauguration of Joe Biden.

Categories
faith

The Orthodox Church must Address the problem at the root

In a recent interview, Patriarch Kyril of Moscow stated that Patriarch Bartholomew recognized the schismatic “church” faction in Ukraine because of pressure from “powerful political forces”. It remains a mystery why the local Orthodox Churches have refrained from confronting the American government through their embassies in their respective capitals? At this point, the primates and bishops of all Orthodox Churches should begin raising awareness among their flocks as to what has transpired.

All Orthodox Churches should publicly denounce the State Department and its intrusive policies in Church affairs. It is time to break the silence of the past two years. Patriarch Bartholomew has been justifiably criticized from throughout the Orthodox world. This criticism along with appeals from some Orthodox primates to the Ecumenical Patriarch to convene a council has failed to achieve anything.

There have been reports over the past year indicating that the Orthodox primates in Georgia, Serbia, and elsewhere have been visited by American diplomats who asked them recognize the fake “church” in Ukraine. To their credit, these Churches have refused to establish communion with the fake “bishops” of Ukraine. One wishes the Archbishops of Athens and Nicosia, along with the holy kinot of Mount Athos had followed the examples of the Georgian and Serbian Churches.

The inter Orthodox fighting has produced nothing. Patriarch Bartholomew has refused to listen to reason and the reality is that he is simply not free. Making appeals to the Ecumenical Patriarch to convene a council has failed because Patriarch Bartholomew is under pressure from the American government. Therefore, the defenders of Orthodoxy need to redirect their criticism to those “powerful political forces” that instigated this entire crisis.

A council should be convened in a similar way as that which was convened by the Patriarch of Jerusalem last year. This time, the subject of the council should address the American problem. It is very clear that a resolution to the ecclesiastical crisis in Ukraine will not be forthcoming until secular political interests have removed themselves from the spiritual and canonical life of the Orthodox Church.

A council should be convened to discuss very simply the involvement of secular interests in the Church and how the free Orthodox Churches should react to the encroachments of the secular world into the spiritual domain. The council could be convened once again under the Patriarch of Jerusalem or it could be convened under the presidency of the Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia.

It does not really matter under whose presidency such a council occurs as long as it convenes and addresses the destructive intrusion into Church life of the secular powers. This does not have to be a formal council with binding decisions as it will not be dealing with either dogmatic, doctrinal, or canonical issues. The restoration of the application of canonical law and norms in Ukraine is a long way off and will have to be dealt with sometime in the future.

Last year’s council in Jordan was not binding but it was productive in the sense that several local Churches took a step forward in discussing the crisis. The next step should be for the local Churches to discuss and to condemn the secular intrusions into the spiritual life of the Church of Christ. As the Churches of Constantinople and Greece are presently not free, they should not be expected to attend such a council.

In any case, the synods of the free Churches should gather among themselves to coordinate protests among the faithful in their own countries and to ask their own governments to protect religious freedom before their local Churches follow the path of the Churches of Constantinople, Greece, and Alexandria. It is time for Orthodoxy to shake off the blows that have been inflicted upon it since 2018 and begin the process of defending the faith.

The above suggestions may not sound like much but at the very least it is time to address the origin of the whole Ukrainian crisis. This is a much needed first step on the road to restore Orthodox unity. The work of the State Department in attempting to influence the Church as if it were a political party or non governmental organization is an outrage and a a violation of religious freedom.

The Orthodox Church must react toward Washington as if the State Department were actually closing closing Churches and suppressing the freedom of Orthodox Christians. What it has done by fomenting schism in the Church and targeting the Russian Church and its daughter Church in Ukraine is just as evil as more open and more direct forms of persecution.

The free Orthodox Churches must go beyond criticizing Washington in interviews. They must begin discussing ways of uniting with one another to resist the ongoing efforts to drag more local Churches into recognizing the schismatics and must openly confront the evil.

Only when the State Department has withdrawn from its meddling in the Churches will peace and unity be restored in the Orthodox Church. Perhaps the Ecumenical Patriarch and the others who have recognized the schismatics will repent?

Categories
faith

Church of Greece and the Pandemic

The Orthodox Church of Greece is confronting the Greek Government over the complex issue of closing Churches for the impending feast of the theophany on January 6. Closing Churches is always a painful matter but in the middle of a worldwide pandemic the Church needs to consider the matter of permitting large numbers of people to congregate in Church. The Bishops of the Church of Greece need to be more flexible with the government and need to consider the expertise of doctors and scientists.

This is absolutely the wrong time for the Church of Greece to confront the Greek government. Back in 2017, when the Tsipras government legalized gay marriage and introduced legislation favoring transgenderism, the Bishops barely protested. Of course, Church services must continue but under the circumstances it is understandable if the Church is not filled with faithful.

The possibility of the spread of covid 19 from one individual to another necessitates that steps be taken to prevent large numbers of people from congregating. Some sort of compromise could be reached such as ensuring only a certain number of people be permitted to attend Church services and all should be required to wear a mask.

It is ironic that the Bishops of Greece have taken a hard line stance now. The possibility of closed Churches is a temporary phenomenon and with scientists predicting the end of the pandemic at some point during 2021 (possibly by fall) this situation will be rectified. The Bishops of the Church of Greece have ironically abandoned their ecclesiastical responsibilities for over a year now and are suddenly presuming to take positions on matters of public health which are the domain of secular authorities and scientists. The Holy Synod of the Church of Greece should be more preoccupied with the ongoing schism within universal Orthodoxy over the Ukrainian affair which threatens the unity of the Orthodox Church over the long run. The Ukrainian schism preceded the pandemic and appears likely to remain a problem when the pandemic disappears.

American officials such as outgoing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and “Ambassador” Geoffrey Pyatt have intervened blatantly in the internal ecclesiastical affairs of the Churches of Constantinople and Greece by urging them to recognize the pseudo-church in Ukraine that consists of hierarchs and priests who were either defrocked or never ordained and consecrated by the canonical Orthodox Church. American officials have made a mockery of Orthodox ecclesiology and canon law and the Bishops of the Orthodox Church of Greece failed to stop them.

The Bishops of the Orthodox Church of Greece should have erupted in anger and rebellion in 2019 when American officials approached them and asked them to recognize the Ukrainian pseudo-church. The Bishops of Greece need to focus on spiritual affairs and to get their house in order. Certainly, it is wise to maintain a healthy distrust of the motives of the Greek government but faced with the reality of the pandemic it is not unreasonable for the Church to make certain non dogmatic concessions in the interest of public health.

The Bishops present confrontation with the government cannot hide the fact that they failed to defend Orthodoxy at a time when it truly mattered and allowed the secular interests of the State Department to intrude into the sacred affairs of the holy Church of Jesus Christ!

The Orthodox Church of Greece should work with the Mitsotakis government in the Justinian tradition of “symphonia” (meaning synergy or harmony). “Symphonia” refers to the traditional alliance between Church and State that was formalized under the Emperor-Saint Justinian of Constantinople during the sixth century. The present Greek government is preferable to both PASOK and Syriza both of which would have been pursuing very aggressive anti Church and anti Christian policies had they been in power at the present time.

The Bishops of the Church of Greece should proceed with prudence and wisdom, and above all with faith. All Orthodox Christians have faith that the healing power of Jesus Christ will end the pandemic! In the meantime, the Church should witness to Christ to both the faithful and to its enemies through fidelity to sacred worship and holy tradition within the present realities that this fallen world finds itself in.

Throughout history, the holy Church of God has always had enemies. This remains unchanged up to the present day. The Bishops of the Church of Greece should respect the opinions of those in the secular sphere such as doctors and concentrate on spiritual matters such as the great spiritual crisis which has created a terrible schism in Orthodoxy.

Categories
faith

Happy New Year!

Mercifully, the year from hell is finally over. The year that brought us the coronavirus, the murder of George Floyd and riots throughout the country, and the victory of Joe Biden in the Presidential election is gone! The year that saw Hagia Sophia and the great Chora Church of our Savior in Constantinople become Mosques is gone!

May the light emanating from the birth of the most glorious King of Israel in Bethlehem shine brightly in the new year! May the incarnate logos that was born of woman and dwelt among men heal the world of the afflictions of disease, madness, and extremism. Glory to Jesus Christ our King and our God, vanquisher of death and disease!

Categories
political

The stupidity of political correctness lives on

Homer’s “The Odyssey” has apparently been removed from a school curriculum in Massachusetts because of its alleged racism and sexism. Also being targeted by other leftists is Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter” and the works of Shakespeare. The stupidity of political correctness ends the year that saw the eruption of violence throughout America and the destruction of statues of historical figures (including abolitionists).

Ideological lunatics control both the Universities as well as the public schools and it appears the time has come for the classics to take a beating. I happen to have received a membership card to join the Republican Party. I have hesitated to make a decision on the grounds that there is much about the Republican Party that I do not agree with. Neo-conservatives and “Christian” Zionists are elements of the Party that are not trustworthy.

Yet, the stupidity of political correctness and the insanity of the political left leaves one with no sensible choice other than to join and support the Republican Party. The Democratic Party is the party of the neo-pagans who support the gay, lesbian, and transgender ideology. It is also the party whose constituency believes in defunding (or outright abolishing) the Police.

The Trump administration was great because for the most part it stood in opposition to both the political correctness of the Democrats and to the worst elements of the Republicans (neo-cons). Now a decision has to be made. At least for the short term, I will be going along with the Republicans with the hope and possibility that the America first agenda of Donald Trump will have taken hold in the Republican Party and that the neocons can be kept in check.

The political left is completely insane and its agenda is aimed directly at the overthrow of Christianity, democracy, and all aspects of culture. Let it not be forgotten that the 2020 elections were conducted under the threat of riots and mass disturbances. The Democratic Party is the party of Marxism, neo-paganism, and censorship.

There is a teacher in that school in Massachusetts that is actually taking credit for being responsible for the removal of Homer’s “The Odyssey” from her school. She openly said that she is proud of this deed. Does anyone really need to guess her party affiliation or which political candidate she voted for in the 2020 Presidential elections?

Categories
faith

The Orthodox Way and Constantinople

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/12/27/last-byzantine-greeks-facing-extinction-in-islamist-led-turkey/

The article in the link above about the last Greeks of Constantinople is very good. This is what the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Orthodox Church of Greece should be focusing on. Very sadly, the Greek Orthodox world has been led to disaster as a result of the collaboration of Patriarch Bartholomew and some Bishops in Greece with the State Department.

Patriarch Bartholomew had one major challenge confronting him when he was enthroned as Ecumenical Patriarch in November 1991. That was to save the Ecumenical Patriarchate and its remaining flock in Constantinople and the islands of Imbros and Tenedos. For a long time it appeared that Patriarch Bartholomew was in fact proceeding to revive the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

A major Pan Orthodox synaxis was held in Constantinople in March 1992 that was unprecedented. Patriarch Bartholomew showed a good deal of courage in surviving nearly a dozen assassination attempts or bomb attacks at the Patriarchate. It can still be said that he faced down Turkish-Islamic terrorism with great bravery.

Alas, with the convening of the problematic pseudo-council of Crete and the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s intervention in Ukraine much damage was done to Constantinople’s prestige in addition to the damage done to Orthodox unity. The plight of the Greek communities in Constantinople and the islands of Imbros and Tenedos is tragic. Quite noticeable is the fact that the Patriarch’s allies have done nothing to alleviate their plight.

The theological school of Halki remains closed and Hagia Sophia and the Chora Church of the Savior are being used as Mosques. The Greek speaking Churches need to end the crisis in Orthodoxy. Any Greek who believes that the Ecumenical Patriarchate ended the schism in Ukraine is deluded. Constantinople has in fact contributed to the persecution of the canonical Ukrainian Church and created a major schism throughout the universal Church.

As an old admirer of the Great Church of Constantinople I am now a profound critic of the Patriarchate and its policies. What the Patriarch needs is criticism and opposition and not blind obedience. This is the Orthodox way. In earlier centuries, the spiritual children of the Church of Constantinople criticized and rebuked their Patriarchs when they strayed from the truth as occurred during the iconoclastic crisis and after the convening of the false Council of Florence. The Patriarchate has an important function to play but not the function Patriarch Bartholomew wants it to play.

The Patriarch has the responsibility to protect itself, its important shrines that remain in Constantinople, and its remaining flock. The Patriarchate cannot fulfill these aspirations if it is defying the precepts of Orthodox ecclesiology and inventing a non existent role for itself and claiming to be “first without equals” in the worlds Eastern Orthodox hierarchy.

Categories
books

The roots of the present crisis in Greek Orthodoxy

Book Review

The Orthodox Church and Independent Greece 1821-1852 by Charles Frazee

Cambridge University Press. 1969

This book is an excellent companion piece to Steven Runciman’s “The Great Church in Captivity” (reviewed here https://thedoubleheadedeagle.blog/?p=1360) which was published one year earlier. Observers of present day ecclesiastical affairs in Constantinople, Greece, and Ukraine may be reminded of events that are presently playing out in our own day. From the inception of Greek independence the great powers began interfering in the internal affairs of Greece.

From the very beginning the western power of the day (in this case Great Britain) meddled unceasingly in Greek Church affairs. Frazee’s book recounts the problems that arose when the Church of Greece was declared “autocephalous” from the Ecumenical Patriarchate in 1833. It is easy to forget that the Patriarchate has had legitimate grievances. Indeed, the autocephaly of the Church of Greece from Constantinople was uncanonical in 1833 much like the “autocephaly” that Patriarch Bartholomew attempted to bestow to Ukrainian schismatics in 2018 was uncanonical.

There are many ironies regarding the position that Constantinople finds itself in today and the position it found itself in during the period of 1833 to 1850. Constantinople today is the aggressor against the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church whereas in 1833 the Ecumenical Patriarchate was the victim of the western powers. There is also one identical cause both for the schism that took place between the Greeks in 1833-1850 and for the schism that has taken place in the Orthodox Church today and that is Russophobia.

It has been forgotten by everybody that the Ecumenical Patriarchate was allied with and was supported by the Russians during the nineteenth century. It is for this reason that the British and the German advisors to the Bavarian (Roman Catholic) King that was imposed on Greece demanded the autocephaly of the Church of Greece. One of those German advisors at the court of the young King Otho was Georg Von Maurer. Frazee writes,

“A second danger was seen by Maurer in the threat of Russia to Greece. It was obvious to all, according to him, that Russia was interested in expansion at the expense of the Ottomans and that the Orthodox populations in the Balkans could be used by that country as a means to reach her goal. Many of the Greek clergy were devoted to Russia and would support Russian ambitions in this area. The Tsar could easily use the patriarchal appointments as a means to control the Greek church, Maurer contended, so that the only way for the new state of Greece to withstand this pressure would be to have a synod independent of Constantinople”.

This assertion of the German Georg Von Maurer has been echoed in our own day by American officials such as “Ambassador” to Greece Geoffrey Pyatt who likewise accuses the Russians of attempting to control the Orthodox Church. The hypocrisy of western officials is identical. Von Maurer and his colleagues in Greece proceeded to do to the Church of Greece exactly what they were accusing the Russians of doing! Outgoing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo along with “Ambassador” Pyatt instigated the schism in Orthodoxy by interfering in internal ecclesiastical matters for political purposes and did exactly what they were accusing the Russians of doing!

One crucial difference between the Church crisis then and the Church crisis now has to do with the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The Church of Constantinople then was the victim of an injustice and Patriarch Anthimos IV who presided over the Church of Constantinople was a pious and holy man who would be known as a defender of Orthodoxy and whose signature appeared on the famous encyclical of 1848 that refuted Papal claims. Patriarch Bartholomew today claims Papal like authority and has colluded in the dismemberment of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Following the declaration of “autocephaly” for the Church of Greece in 1833, an anti ecclesiastical campaign was undertaken by the German King and his advisors. Over four hundred Greek Monasteries were closed. The septuagaint version of the Old Testament was prohibited, Byzantine style iconography was banned and replaced by western religious “art”, and Churches were built in a Protestant style without the Byzantine domes.

An Orthodox reader of this book is sure to be outraged as I was when I first read it back in the early 1990’s. It is perplexing to see how it is that today’s hierarchs in Constantinople and Greece seem to have either forgotten the unpleasant history of 1833 to 1850, or are simply ignoring it. The similarities between what transpired then in Greece, and what is now happening in Ukraine are unmistakable.

In the name of anti Russian hysteria, the Orthodox Church is being exploited and used as a political prop by the godless western elites just as the Church was used in the nineteenth century to undermine the Russians. In the nineteenth century, there was Greek opposition to what was happening, just as there have been signs of opposition in Greece to the recognition of the Ukrainian schismatics by the Greek synod at the behest of the American Department of State.

In the nineteenth century, a great monk by the name of Christophoros Papoulakos openly preached against the Roman Catholic King and his advisors. In recent months, Greek faithful in the city of Patras defended their beloved Cathedral of Saint Andrew which contains the relics of the holy apostle by preventing visiting “bishops” from the schismatic entity in Ukraine from concelebrating the liturgy.

The Frazee book is an excellent book that deserves to be reexamined by all Orthodox Christians (especially Greeks) in light of the present crimes being perpetrated against the Orthodox Church by the great western power of the day.

Categories
political

Greece, Russia, and America

The spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova has publicly criticized outgoing American Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The Russian Foreign Ministry has accurately assessed the dominating role of Washington in Greek internal affairs. The Russian Spokeswoman pointed out that Washington demands that Greece and Cyprus not cooperate with Russia.

Furthermore, the Russian spokeswoman referred to the crisis in the Orthodox Church in Ukraine that was precipitated by American officials such as Mike Pompeo. The Russians have a firm grasp of the domineering attitude toward Greece and Cyprus by Washington. On the other hand, there are still issues to be ironed out between Athens and Moscow as well.

Russia has in recent months made many pro Greek statements such as condemning the Turkish opening of the beach of Varosha in the Turkish occupied territories and has endorsed Greece’s right to extend its territory in the Aegean Sea to twelve nautical miles. At the same time Russia maintains a friendly attitude toward Turkey.

Greek-Russian brotherhood based on Orthodoxy is desirable and Athens should pursue a pro Russian foreign policy. However, Athens and Moscow can and should discuss the problem of Turkey. Greece and Cyprus are in a struggle for survival. Turkey is a jihadist state that represents a menace to all, including Russia.

Greek-Russian relations have the potential to flourish. But at the same time Greece faces a threat from Turkey. As such, Athens needs to also maintain friendly ties with Washington as well. Ties with Washington are complicated by the latter’s dominating influence over Greece.

Greece has come far under Prime Minister Mitsotakis and his aggressive defense against Turkish aggression is admirable. Now the Greek government needs to also assert its sovereignty against its alleged “allies” in the west. Athens must pursue an independent foreign policy based on Hellenic interests above all.

There is a good deal that unites Greece with Russia. Russian-Turkish ties have been strained by Ankara’s support for international jihadism (mainly Syrian) and it is unlikely that these ties will hold indefinitely for a long period of time. Greece needs to negotiate seriously with the Russians on the matter of Turkey.

The Church issue in Ukraine has needlessly complicated Greek relations with Russia. Athens must distance itself from the actions of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and elements within the Church of Greece. It is important for Greece to maintain close ties with Russia for spiritual, historic, cultural, and national reasons.

Being close with Russia does not necessitate closing the door to Washington. Washington is sabotaging itself in Greece by interfering in ecclesiastical matters and seeking to dictate the formation of Greek foreign policy. Ultimately, the direction in Greek foreign policy depends on the national interests of Athens, Washington, and Moscow.

If the incoming Biden administration pursues a rabidly anti Russian foreign policy, Athens should not cooperate with Washington. Greece has one deadly enemy and that is Turkey. If Washington is interested in cooperation against Turkey then Greece can and should cooperate with Washington

The issue of Turkey is the complicating factor in relations between Athens and Moscow. But then again Moscow has expressed support for Cyprus (Varosha) and Greece (twelve nautical miles) as mentioned above. In any case, Greeks must behave with a sense of national honor and as an independent state.

All foreign relations should be based on the principles of Greek national interests and aspirations. Unfortunately, this is hindered by the overbearing policies of the United States and NATO toward Greece. The Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman is correct in expressing Russian criticism of western policy in Greece.

The groundwork toward Greek-Russian relations should begin but such relations will take off when Russia’s friendship with Turkey ends. In the meantime, Greece must be cautious in its relations with Washington. Washington is more interested for now in going after Moscow than Ankara.

This is intolerable from a Hellenic standpoint.

Categories
political

Hagia Sophia Diaries 20

The Hagia Sophia diaries is a series of entries with commentaries pertaining to the latest developments on the matter of the Great Church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople.

It appears that UNESCO has sent a request to the Turkish government asking to examine the Churches of Hagia Sophia and the Saviour of Chora. UNESCO officials claim that that they are asking to examine the former Churches because of rumors they have heard “regarding the Christian elements in the building”.

This is actually a positive move because Turkish President Erdogan in the face of international criticism in response to his government’s action in converting Hagia Sophia into a Mosque gave strict assurances that Hagia Sophia would be protected. It will be very good if the experts sent by UNESCO were to actually make an inspection of Hagia Sophia and the Church of the saviour at Chora. It is unlikely that Turkey will not change the Christian character of Hagia Sophia assuming they have not done so already.

There is more hope to be put in the efforts of individuals working for UNESCO who have an expertise on Byzantine art and architecture than on the bureaucrats of UNESCO who failed to protest Turkish actions until it was too late. Putting people in the field who are serious academics and experts is a slight improvement over the efforts that were made by many supporters of Hagia Sophia and Chora toward UNESCO’s diplomats and political representatives who failed miserably to protect Hagia Sophia’s status as a world heritage site.

One one can only hope and pray that the struggle for Hagia Sophia is not over. We will wait and see if UNESCO has any backbone at this late date to actually send real experts on Hagia Sophia into the field to document what has been done.