Categories
Letters

Letter to the New York Times


The following letter is in response to the August 30 editorial, “There’s a new game of thrones in the mediterranean”. The Times editorial concedes that international law is on the side of Greece, but seemingly advocates the appeasement of Turkey. Furthermore, many of the facts recounted by the editorial make the case for supporting Greece against Turkey as Ankara is very clearly a major threat to international peace and stability. Turkey’s threats to unleash unlimited numbers of refugees into Europe should further the case for supporting Greece in the Mediterranean. The western world has wronged the historical victims of Turkish genocide and aggression including the Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, Kurds, and Arabs. America and Europe have a crucial opportunity to correct these injustices and to demonstrate their support for democratic norms and values by supporting democratic Greece and Cyprus against an increasingly authoritarian Turkey.

The Times editorial criticizes the Trump administration for not emulating the previous handling of crises between Greece and Turkey by previous administrations. This argument completely ignores the fact that every previous “resolution” aimed allegedly at defusing conflict between Athens and Ankara resulted in sacrificing Greece and Cyprus to the aggressive designs of Turkey. On January 31, 1996 the Clinton administration forced Greece to remove its flag from an islet that maps and international treaties proved was Greek territory. Such “solutions” were in actual fact nothing more than appeasement. Nothing better demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of the handling of Greek-Turkish conflicts any better than the fact that Turkey maintains its occupation of the northern part of Cyprus almost fifty years after the invasions of that sovereign Republic by Turkish forces. 


The Turkish regime under President Erdogan is an international threat to peace and stability. Greece deserves full support from all governments and alliances that claim to espouse international law and democratic values and norms.

Theodore G. Karakostas 

The link to the article being responded to

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/30/opinion/turkey-greece-oil-gas.html

Categories
political

Hagia Sophia Diaries 17

The Turkish government now requires all female visitors to Hagia Sophia to wear headscarves and to cover their legs. The government had given assurance that visitors could visit Hagia Sophia for free, but anyone who is not properly dressed must now pay to purchase coverings in order to enter Hagia Sophia. Throughout much of the Muslim world their continues to be praise for the Turkish government for its actions in converting Hagia Sophia.

The support of Palestinian groups for the conversion of Hagia Sophia and Turkey should be seen by Greeks as a signal that alliances are changing. Greece and Cyprus have been establishing better relations with Israel over the last decade or so, and this must continue. Greece must view any and all governments that support the conversion of Hagia Sophia in an unfriendly light.

The Greek Foreign Ministry should call diplomats from those countries to raise a formal protest over their public support for the conversion of Hagia Sophia. The Ministry of Culture should also begin putting pressure on UNESCO to take a more aggressive stance on the issue. UNESCO sent one letter of protest to the Turkish government and went silent again.

The further conversion of the the Church of the savior at Chora indicates that the conversion of Church-Museums in Turkey may not stop. The Greek world, the international media, and cultural institutions waited much too long to respond to these Turkish provocations. This is a process that began in 2013 with the conversion of the Church-Museum of Hagia Sophia in Trebizond.

As far as the international reaction is concerned, better late than never. However, the danger now is that the media and cultural organizations will simply accept what Turkey has done and will go back to sleep. There needs to be a continued reaction of protests and boycotts of Turkey at all levels.

Greece should also make it clear to any country that has praised the actions of the Erdogan government that this will lead to a deterioration of relations with that particular country. Hagia Sophia can never be considered a Mosque as its Christian origins are beyond dispute. The Erdogan government’s conversion of all Churches since 2013 constitute acts of aggression.

Those governments which supported these acts of provocation display an unfriendly attitude toward Greece. The Greek Foreign Ministry should convey this stance to the diplomats of those countries that are stationed in Athens.

Categories
Letters

Letter to the Art Newspaper

The following is in response to the piece by Holger A. Klein in the Turkish conversion of the Savior Church of Chora. As a Greek Orthodox author of three books and various articles I can only say to academics such as Mr. Klein that present criticisms of the Turkish government are too little, too late. The Turkish government in 2013 converted the Church of Hagia Sophia in Trebizond into a Mosque. No one took any notice and no one protested the outrage.

The Turkish authorities proceeded to convert at least two more Church-Museums named Hagia Sophia in Nicea (Iznik) and Adrianople (Edirne) without any protests.As an Orthodox Greek, I made phone calls to the UNESCO offices in New York and sent them emails bringing to their attention the Turkish conversion of the above mentioned Church-Museums and their ultimate goal for the conversion of Hagia Sophia of Constantinople. During the summer of 2014 I visited a UNESCO office in Athens and in March 2015 I visited the UNESCO headquarters in Paris to raise attention to the Turkish plans for the conversion of Hagia Sophia. I was given repeated assurances that UNESCO authorities had been in touch with Turkish officials and had been “assured” by them that Hagia Sophia would be left unmolested.  

One year later during the spring of 2016 Hagia Sophia of Constantinople was used for Muslim prayers. No protests from UNESCO, and certainly no protests from the academic community. Perhaps Mr. Klein can tell me where his voice was over the past seven years as the movement to convert Hagia Sophia was gaining steam? Where were the voices and protests from the academic community? There is no shortage of protests now that the evil deeds have been carried out but where were the protests and the outrages when they would have made a difference?


There are certain inaccuracies in the article by Mr. Klein. Mr. Klein refers to Hagia Sophia as a Mosque. Let us understand that Hagia Sophia of Constantinople and other Hagia Sophia Churches, along with the Church of the Savior at Chora are CHURCHES, not Mosques. Thomas Wittemore of the Byzantine Institute could have referred to them as Mosques because they were in use as such during the period of time he expressed concern about them. However, let it not be forgotten the Christian temples that are falling victim to the predatory government of Turkey are Churches, not Mosques. Mosques do not have images of the incarnate God and savior Jesus Christ, the most Holy Theotokos andMother of God, and the Holy Apostles and fathers of the Church within them. 


Certainly, Christians recognize the importance of these Churches to secular history but the sacred and divine origins of these great Christian temples must not be dismissed or disrespected. Without the Holy Gospel there would be no Hagia Sophia. Hagia Sophia and the Church of Chora can never be Mosques or Museums. Their roots lie with the divinity of the God-Man Jesus Christ who became incarnate in the flesh. Hagia Sophia is a Church and it is highly offensive that the article by Mr. Klein minimized the Christian origins of the Byzantine Churches mentioned in his commentary.

Criticism of the Turkish government even at this late date is welcome. However, the academic community and UNESCO should recognize they made mistakes and waited too long to protest the Turkish aggression against Hagia Sophia.They should also make sure to be historically, culturally, and theologically accurate when discussing these Church-Museums as they were founded as Christian Cathedrals and Churches. Referring to them as Mosques in the context in which Mr. Klein writes does a disservice to Orthodox Christians who are the real guardians of Hagia Sophia and inadvertently strengthens the case of the Turkish government. 


The case against the Erdogan government’s conversion of these Byzantine Churches lies not with the legacy of Mustafa Kemal (the so called “Ataturk) but with those of the Byzantine Emperors of Constantinople such as Saint Justinian who presided over the construction of these miraculous temples for the purpose of worshipping the Triune God. Saint Justinian the Great who presided over the construction of Hagia Sophia is not even mentioned in the article by Mr.Klein while the so called “Ataturk” who was the architect of the genocide of Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek Christians is given undue prominence.

Certainly, the appeal to stop the conversion of Church-Museums into Mosques can be made on the basis of cultural and historical sensitivities, but the theological and spiritual roots of these Churches are the greatest reasons why the Turkish government’s actions should be condemned.

Theodore G. Karakostas

Link to the article being responded to

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/comment/istanbul-s-exceptional-cultural-heritage-must-not-be-lost

Categories
Further interest

Church of the Savior in Chora News Sources

The following post contains links that follow developments with regard to the Church of the savior at Chora

Updated on December 26, 2020

The Art Newspaper

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/comment/istanbul-s-exceptional-cultural-heritage-must-not-be-lost

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/erdogan-ruling-puts-sistine-chapel-of-byzantium-at-risk-critics-say

Orthodox Churches on Chora Church

http://www.patriarchia.ru/en/db/text/5681788.html

https://orthodoxtimes.com/russian-foreign-ministry-the-chora-church-is-one-of-the-most-important-unesco-monuments/

News Outlets

https://greekcitytimes.com/2020/10/28/chora-church-covered-turkish-authorities/

https://orthodoxtimes.com/erdogan-will-pray-at-chora-church-on-october-30/

https://scroll.in/article/973364/as-erdogan-converts-byzantine-churches-into-mosques-there-is-more-at-stake-than-just-the-monuments

https://www.dw.com/en/like-hagia-sophia-turkey-to-reconvert-chora-museum-into-mosque/a-54713753

https://www.foxnews.com/world/hagia-sophia-turkey-museum-turned-into-mosque

UNESCO

https://bianet.org/english/religion/235454-report-unesco-applies-to-inspect-hagia-sophia-chora-after-conversion

Categories
books

The legacy of the Colonels

Book Review

The Greek Connection The Life of Elias Demetracopoulos And the Untold Story of Watergate by James H. Barron

Melville House 2020

Just as one has come to believe that the story of the Greek military dictatorship(s) from 1967 to 1974 has been fully told, a new account of that era has been put fourth that focuses on the heroic activities of journalist Elias Demetracopoulos. This is a very good book that tells a very important story and serves to remind Greeks of the way in which Greece has been mistreated by the great powers. This book is not only a fine work of history but an important contribution to the historical understanding of the nature of Greek politics and the politics and diplomacy of the American foreign policy establishment.

The release of this book comes at a time when political extremism veers toward the left wing of the political spectrum. This book is an important reminder of the time in both Greece and America when extremism veered toward the right wing. The story of Mr. Demetracopoulos is told and it is a very heroic one.

Elias Demetracopoulos was a boy in Nazi occupied Greece who resisted the Germans and was imprisoned. He became a very successful and prominent journalist in Greece who clashed with several American ambassadors. This was the period in history when the American government interfered in Greek internal affairs (and still does to a certain extent).

Elias Demetracopoulos established contacts not only in Greece but in the United States in which he took refuge following the imposition of the military dictatorship on Greece in April 1967. What is truly amazing is the slander that was directed against this moderate opponent of the Papadopoulos dictatorship. This journalist was moderate in his politics and was opposed to communism as well as the neo-fascism of the Colonels.

In America he established contacts with many prominent journalists, politicians, and military officials. Many of these individuals were staunch conservatives. This included the late Robert Novak and the late Rowland Evans. This biography of Elias Dematracopoulos is an affirmation that the Coup of 1967 was not about preventing the imposition of communist totalitarianism on Greece, but on eradicating the sovereignty and independence of Greece and eradicating Greek democracy.

This book recounts what has been previously documented regarding dictator George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos was a Nazi collaborator during the Second World War who served in the security battalions under the collaborationist government. Furthermore, as a working journalist in Athens Dematracopoulos infuriated Greek Prime Minister Constantine Karamanlis for revealing that America had installed nuclear weapons in Greece.

Dematracopoulos informed the Greek people about nuclear weapons in their country and the prospective consequences in the event of a confrontation with the Soviet Union in which Greece would have played a prominent offensive role and would have served as a prime target for Moscow. This revelation was a serious wake up call considering present day efforts of American officials in Athens such as Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt to promote conflict between Greece and present day Russia. Many things in the relationship between Greece and the United States have changed for the better and some things have not changed.

The most significant change from the era recounted in the book is that democracy in Greece has been for most part irreversible. There are two events in the past decade or so in which Greek democracy has been challenged. The first incident occurred in 2008 when the Government of Prime Minister Constantine Karamanlis (the nephew and namesake of the aforementioned Prime Minister) came under pressure to resign in the aftermath of an effort to establish an oil pipeline agreement with Russia and Bulgaria. Incidents such as these along with the collusion of the Simitis government in 1999 which surrendered Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan to the Turks indicate that the restoration of Greek sovereignty in the post dictatorship era has not been one hundred percent successful.

A second challenge to Greek democracy came from the rise of Golden Dawn in the elections of 2012. The legacy of the Greek dictatorship can be judged by its present day sympathizers. Only Golden Dawn expresses admiration for the Papadopoulos regime. Golden Dawn is a Neo-Nazi organization that promotes holocaust denial, anti semitism and other forms of racism, and neo paganism.

In the past two years, Greece has overcome both right wing extremism (Golden Dawn) and left wing extremism (the Marxist Syriza Party). The downfall of Syriza and the complete collapse of Golden Dawn bode well for the future of Greece. Liberal democracy appears to have recovered nicely under the leadership of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis.

The book recounts many troubling facts regarding the Greek dictatorship. For example, many Greek Americans supported the regime. The Nixon administration comes off as as especially vile in its disregard for the sadistic torture and brutality against political dissidents in Greece. There was a prominent Greek American who served as a supporter of both the dictatorship and the Nixon administration who comes off very poorly.

Theories abound that there was a Greek connection to Watergate. The Watergate break in may have been because the Colonels contributed $500,000 dollars to the Nixon campaign in 1968. Elias Demetracopoulos had sent evidence of this to the chairman of the Democratic Party and it is speculated this is what the Watergate burglars were looking for. The cash that the Colonels contributed to the Nixon campaign may very well have been from American aid from taxpayers which would have consisted of American taxpayers cash being used for partisan political purposes in funding the campaign of Richard Nixon.

Elias Demetracopoulos worked tirelessly against the Colonels as well as against the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department which not only slandered him but threatened to have him deported back to Athens. When the Greek journalist’s father was on his death bed, Demetracopoulos reached out to his political friends in Washington for help in obtaining safe passage for him to visit his father. He was warned by Senator Edward Kennedy to reject any offers of safe passage as such an offer would be a trick by the Colonels to lure him to Athens.

Mention is made of Henry Kissinger. This book very effectively conveys to the reader why Greeks absolutely loathe this former Secretary of State. Kissinger is a horrible human being and every new revelation regarding Greece and Cyprus at this time only reaffirms what a monster this man really is. Elias Dematracopoulos was friends with the late Christopher Hitchens. No one has ever done as much to expose Kissinger as Hitchens who publicly denounced him as a “war criminal” and called for him to be put on trial.

Mention is made of the events in Cyprus during the summer of 1974 and the role of Kissinger in the attempted ouster of President Makarios of Cyprus and the subsequent Turkish invasions. There is interesting information on how the Greek American community came together in 1974 to demand that Congress impose an arms embargo on Turkey. That achievement was one of the finest accomplishments of the Greek American community.

The book accurately describes the pro Turkish tilt of American administrations. It is recounted that the Greek American community supported the election of Jimmy Carter only to be disappointed by that administration which maintained support for Turkey over Greece. The support for the military dictatorship in Greece was never pro Greek but an effort to impose western dictates on Greece.

The real disregard that Washington had for Greece came to be seen after the overthrow of George Papadopoulos by another dictator Dimitrios Ioannides and following the restoration of Greek democracy when the elder Karamanlis returned to Greece. Kissinger made it very clear to the Ford administration that replaced the Nixon administration that Turkey was more important than Greece.

In the year 2020, things have changed. Most changes have been relatively positive. Some negatives remain such as the aforementioned strangle hold that Washington has over Greek foreign policy. The most important difference in relations between Athens and Washington today is that Turkey has lost its strategic value.

Turkey has defected from the western alliance and in its provocations of Greece, Athens seems to have American support. The challenge for Greeks is to win over the United States as a real and genuine ally in point of fact and not just on paper. If the United States commits itself fully to the isolation of Turkey and the territorial, legal, and moral rights of Greece and Cyprus all the negative connotations of past relations between Washington and Athens may disappear.

The late Elias Demetracopoulos is a very heroic figure who fought valiantly for the liberation of Greece from dictatorship and lobbied hard after the anti Makarios Coup in Cyprus to prevent the Turkish invasions. He established friendships with American conservatives and liberal alike. It is not likely that prominent Republican conservatives and military officials would have remained friends with someone who was a “communist”.

The end of the economic crisis in Greece and the rapid disappearance of Golden Dawn indicates that Greek politics have been stabilized. Greece does not need the likes of Golden Dawn or the Colonels which that party has repeatedly praised. In terms of national interest, the Colonels not only left Greece in a pathetically weakened state, they abandoned Cyprus to the Turks.

A previous work on the Colonels regime entitled, “The Rape of Greece” by Peter Murtagh published in 1994 recounted that the Colonels promoted “double enosis” for Cyprus. In other words, what the Turks called “taksim”meaning partition. It should not be forgotten that the Colonels betrayed both Greece and Cyprus.

This biography of Elias Demetracopoulos by James H. Barron has a great deal to commend it. The ongoing activities of Congress, the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department, and the media are all recounted here. Vivid examples are also given with regard to the collaboration between the foreign policy apparatus in Washington and various newspapers and media outlets. Many journalists acted in ways that were not in accordance with the objective aims of their profession.

In conclusion, this is a fine book on modern Greek history as well as on American foreign policy. Elias Demetracopoulos is an example of a Greek success story who was able to make a difference and to contribute greatly to the demise of the Colonels. He was not only a superb journalist but demonstrated great diplomatic prowess by alliances he established with many on both sides of the political spectrum.

His example should serve to inspire Greek Americans in their struggles to build support for Greece and Cyprus.

Categories
faith

Hagia Sophia Diaries 16

The Orthodox Times has criticized the Moscow Patriarchate by accusing the Russian Church of “attacking” the Ecumenical Patriarchate. This is in fact untrue. The Russian Church has criticized the Turkish government for the most recent outrage of the Erdogan government which has converted the historic Church of the Savior at Chora.

The Russian Church stated that the Ecumenical Patriarchate was not content with being “first among equals” and created division. This is true considering the destruction and chaos that has ensued in Ukraine. The canonical Ukrainian Church is facing persecution from schismatics linked to extremist groups.

All this is true, and it is to the credit of the Russian Church that it has condemned the conversion of the Chora Church as it has the conversion of Hagia Sophia. This latest outrage on the part of the Turkish authorities is further evidence that the schism in Orthodoxy over the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s intervention in Ukraine must come to an end. The Greek world faces serious threats from Turkey, including Ankara’s territorial claims on the Greek islands and the continental shelf.

The Greek world does not need the schism and its aftereffects. The Ecumenical Patriarch needs to settle this schism by convening a Pan Orthodox Council that would rule on the Ukrainian situation. It should be remembered that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo encouraged Patriarch Bartholomew to invade the Russian Church’s territory in Ukraine.

What exactly has the State Department done to save Hagia Sophia or the Christ the Savior Church in Chora? It should be remembered that the State Department under John Foster Dulles in 1955 failed to even condemn the anti Greek pogroms in Constantinople that set the stage for the destruction of the Patriarchate’s flock. The State Department has done nothing for the theological school of Halki either.

The Greek world is suffering the loss of important shrines in Constantinople. Both Greece and Cyprus are are the targets of Turkish aggression. The Greek world needs to remain on friendly terms with America, Russia, Europe, and other parties in order to resist Turkey.

Resolving the Ukrainian Church dispute according to the ruling of a pan Orthodox synod will remove a spiritual crisis from the Greek Churches and restore their relations with the Russian Church and the other local Churches. It is time to end this Ukrainian Church crisis and for Constantinople’s “supporters” to stop with the cheap shots at the Russian Church.

Categories
political

More on the bounties

Reuters news agency writes that CNN reported that Iran had offered bounties to the Taliban. This on top of earlier reports that Russia had offered bounties to the Taliban to kill American troops. All of this is preposterous.

It is hard to argue whether it is more ridiculous that the Russians or the Iranians offered bounties on American troops to the Taliban. All should be able to agree that the Taliban represent the lunatic fringe of Islamic extremism, exceeded in its violence and fanaticism only by the Islamic State.

The Iranians have religious and political differences with the Taliban, most notably the persecution of Shiite Muslims by that movement when it ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. Whatever differences with the United States the Iranians have (this is a foreign policy area where Trump is in the wrong), the fact is that Tehran’s officials sat down with American officials to negotiate the nuclear agreement that Trump (wrongly) withdrew the United States from.

Russian collusion with the Taliban would also be insane. The Russians and the Iranians both fought against the type of extremism that the Taliban adheres to when they combined their efforts to preserve the territorial integrity of Syria and to bring about the downfall of the Islamic State. Where is the evidence of either Russian or Iranian collusion with the Taliban?

The anti Russian hysteria that has been predominant among the Democrats and their media (CNN, the New York Times etc) is as strong as ever. There are many reasons why Joe Biden must be defeated in November. The most important reason why Biden and the Democrats must be defeated is because of the risk of a potential conflict with Russia.

The demonization of Russia by the Democrats and their media over the past four years will have consequences in the realm of foreign relations were the Democrats to actually hold power. Russia has been blamed for Hillary Clinton’s election loss and more recently Russians have been blamed for inciting the riots in America. In 2017, Democratic official Paul Begala called for the bombing of Russia.

While the Democrats are the more dangerous of the two parties, the Republicans are also a cause for concern. The neocons who still have a dangerous influence within the Republican Party are advocates of war with Iran. As with Russia, war with Iran would be an act of madness.

President Donald Trump seems to have taken control of his foreign policy when he fired psychotic National Security Advisor John Bolton. Conflict with Iran has been avoided. A continuation of the Trump administration is preferable to a Democratic administration which could provoke a war with Russia.

This idea of a Russian or Iranian bounty on American soldiers is inherently stupid. It should be kept in mind that the Democrats (and the Republican neo cons) who supported the downfall of the Asaad regime were in effect endorsing a policy that was favorable to the Islamic State. It is far more accurate to say that the policies favored by the traditional foreign policy elites (which Trump has removed) were supportive of the Islamic State and other Jihadists.

The Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq and the Obama administrations policies in Syria and Libya were to the benefit of the Islamic State and other Jihadists. Russian and Iranian policies have been in opposition to fanatical Jihadists.

Categories
faith

Orthodoxy and the Democrats

The Greek Orthodox Archbishop of America appeared at the Democratic National Convention and offered a prayer for Presidential nominee Joe Biden. On the one hand, we are taught by the Church to pray for our leaders irrespective of ideology or party affiliation. During the divine liturgy bishops and priests always pray for the head of state irrespective of political affiliation.

It is one thing to pray for our President whoever it may be in Church services. It is quite another to pray for a Presidential candidate who represents a political party that is fervently anti Christian. One could argue he is simply offering up a blessing to a man who may be elected to the Presidency. We will see if the Archbishop will be at the Republican National Convention to offer up prayers for the current President.

Greek Orthodox faithful in America should be concerned about the Democratic Party. The Democrats are rabidly anti Christian. Groups such as “antifa” and “black lives matter” make up a huge part of the base of the Democratic Party. The burning of Bibles by these groups should be condemned by all Orthodox faithful. The Archbishop could have inspired confidence had he taken a brief moment to condemn the burning of Bibles.

In addition to the sacrilege against the holy scriptures, the Democratic Party supports infanticide, sex changes for children, and many of its officials who serve as Mayors throughout America ordered the Police to stand down as rioters destroyed public and private property. The base of the Democratic Party incited hatred of the Police and demands the “defunding” or outright abolition of the Police.

Such a disturbing agenda should be a cause for protests by the Greek Orthodox hierarchy. There are other reasons to be concerned about a Biden administration. As Senator, Joe Biden supported the bombing of Serbia and the seizure of Kosovo from Orthodox Serbia. Serbs became the victims of ethnic cleansing following the withdrawal of Serbian troops from Kosovo and it should not be forgotten that NATO bombed Serbia on Orthodox Easter.

As Vice President, Joe Biden supported the destruction of Syria which led to the near genocide of the Orthodox (and other) Christians of Syria. Joe Biden was part of an administration that included neoconservatives such as Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt who instigated the conflict in Ukraine in 2014. In addition, Joe Biden has made statements supporting the “autocephaly” of the pseudo “church” in Ukraine, a matter he has no business commenting on.

On Greek matters, Joe Biden has done nothing for Greece. His advocacy as Vice President in the Obama administration led to the refugee crisis from Syria which flooded the Greek islands with refugees. At no point, did the Obama administration reverse Washington’s traditional pro Turkish policies. There is no shortage of reasons why Greek Orthodox should be distrustful of the Democratic Party.

Perhaps his Eminence was just bestowing a friendly blessing. In that case it will be well and good if his Eminence is present at the Republican National Convention to ensure that the Archdiocese is not becoming involved in partisan politics.

Categories
political

Erdogan’s genocidal ambitions

Turkish President Erdogan has criticized the Republican People’s Party for “losing” the Greek islands that are off the Turkish coast. The Republican People’s Party was the party that was founded by the murderous dictator and general Mustafa Kemal Pasha. Kemal was responsible for conquering territories that had been lost to the Ottoman Empire in 1918 including Constantinople (occupied by the western powers), Smyrna and other lands liberated by Greece, and independent Armenia.

The forcible reconquest of all these territories was carried out through genocide and ethnic cleansing. Only with the deliberate murder and forcible expulsions of the native Christian populations was it possible for Kemal to reclaim these lands for the successor state to the Ottoman Empire that he subsequently created. At the Lausanne Conference of 1923, Kemal practically dictated the terms of “peace” between his own movement and Greece.

Despite Kemal’s conquests of all these territories, Turks like Erdogan remain unsatisfied. Erdogan openly covets the Greek islands that are near the Asia minor coast despite the fact that the populations of these islands are overwhelmingly Greek and have been Hellenic for many centuries before the Turks ever showed up. Turkey today could only take these islands through genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Erdogan would not be the only Turkish leader to advocate genocide and territorial expansionism at the expense of Greece. Kemal of course is the most notorious practitioner of genocide (along with the Young Turks who preceded him). Another leader of the Republican People’s Party, Bulent Ecevit ordered the invasion and occupation of Cyprus in 1974 which led to the ethnic cleansing of 200,000 Greek Cypriots. For Erdogan, Kemal and Ecevit were much too soft on the Greeks.

It is very clear that Erdogan is a psychopath and an extreme narcissist. Greece and Cyprus need to be fully prepared to defend themselves and their native populations from Turkish aggression. Fortunately, Prime Minister Mitsotakis seems to be prepared for the difficult road ahead. For the first time in decades, Greece has a government that is competent in both foreign affairs and in domestic affairs.

The successful handing of the coronavirus epidemic in Greece has won Greece good will and the Prime Minister has a good reputation with a good deal of political and diplomatic sophistication (in contrast to his predecessor). Mitsotakis has been standing up to Turkey over the matter of the continental shelf and has won the backing of Egypt, Israel, the European Union, and the United States (although it is unclear how far American support will go). Mitsotakis could become another Venizelos if he continues to succeed in building up international support against Erdogan’s genocidal ambitions.

Categories
books

The Dictators

Book Reviews

Stalin Waiting for Hitler 1929-1941 by Stephen Kotkin. Penguin Press. 2017

Hitler by Peter Longerich. Oxford University Press. 2019.

The Stalin book is the second volume of a three volume set published by scholar Stephen Kotkin. Both the Kotkin book and the Hitler biography by Peter Longerich are the products of superb research. Both texts are over nine hundred pages and the footnotes and bibliography are very lengthy and impressive.

We live in an age where academic institutions have been corrupted by ideology. It is refreshing to see that there are real historians and scholars at work spending years compiling information and research to publish biographies of the two most notorious dictators of the twentieth century. Reexamining the totalitarian states of the twentieth century is of extreme importance in our day as free speech and independent thought have been challenged in both academia and much of the news media.

The Stalin book is a detailed recollection of the political rule and foreign and domestic policies of Joseph Stalin. There is a good deal of material on the great terror of the 1930’s. Stalin was the practitioner of a true totalitarian regime in which the control of the government over its citizenry was total. Under Stalin, no citizen was safe. Even ideological allies of the dictator were not safe and the leadership of the communist party, the red army, the NKVD (secret police) and the foreign ministry were subjected to purges which resulted in the mass murders of its leaders for no logical reason.

Stalin murdered most of his army officers. This would have serious consequences. Unbelievably, Stalin ignored warnings not only from the British and Americans that Hitler was planning an invasion of Russia, but he ignored warnings from his own spies that were working in Germany. Spies and Soviet diplomats in Germany warned the dictator that Germany would invade.

Even the gathering German troops near the Soviet border was not enough to convince Stalin that Hitler was planning an invasion. Military leaders and others thoroughly convinced the Nazis planned to invade had to choose their words carefully in trying to persuade Stalin that Germany was going to invade. Any wrong words could lead to that individuals death.

The Longerich biography of Hitler is one of the best. Not quite as good as the two volume biography by Ian Kershaw (which is still the best biography of Hitler) but it is excellent and thoroughly details Hitlers rise to power and the evolution of German domestic and foreign policies under Hitler. A superb piece of work.

Recent events have demonstrated the totalitarian mindset of political extremists within the United States. Academic institutions need to get out of the business of promoting “social change” and “diversity” and return to the business of educating students. The two aforementioned biographies are necessary reading for students in the social sciences.

These books are crucial to the study of history and how the ideologies which their subjects adhered to corrupted politics and destroyed their societies. These biographies are a reminder of the importance of moderation in politics and the need to reject all extremisms from the far left to the far right.