Having learned a lesson from his first term where Democrats and Neocons conspired to impeach him and block his efforts to change foreign policy, President Trump is off to a rapid start enacting changes. He has begun cracking down on transgender madness by blocking federal funds for hospitals, schools, or other institutions who push this madness on children. He is also pushing for religious freedom for families who’s children are being indoctrinated by LGBT propaganda.
His most ambitious policies however are in the realm of foreign policy. Dozens of neocons and other warmongers including Mike Pompeo and John Bolton have had their national security clearances revoked. So has Geoffrey Pyatt, former Ambassador to Greece.
Pompeo and Pyatt played a role in the schism in Orthodoxy by blatantly interfering in Church affairs. Even more good news is that Tulsi Gabbard has been confirmed by the Senate as director of national intelligence. Gabbard is known for her pro Greek sympathies and condemning the persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
It is not an accident that there was a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas right before Trump’s inauguration. Trump made it known he wanted a ceasefire and the slaughter stopped. Now, the President is speaking to Russian President Putin about peace in Ukraine.
This is an especially welcome development. After the election, outgoing President Biden gave Ukraine the go ahead to strike the Russians on their own territory. The Biden administration may have been hoping to sabotage Trump’s plans to end the Ukrainian war. The Russians wisely avoided escalating the war. Perhaps they realized the Democrats and the neocons were trying to sabotage the incoming Trump administration.
Things are starting to look good. A great start for the second Trump term.
2 replies on “Trump’s Great Start”
This text presents a very specific perspective on recent political events, particularly focusing on President Trump’s actions and policies. It’s interesting how the author frames the narrative around themes of foreign policy, religious freedom, and the influence of certain political figures. However, I wonder if the portrayal of certain groups and individuals is entirely balanced. For example, the term “transgender madness” seems dismissive and lacks nuance. Could the author provide more context or evidence to support these claims? Additionally, the emphasis on the role of neocons and their alleged interference in Church affairs raises questions about the broader geopolitical implications. What are the long-term consequences of these policy changes? Overall, the text seems to reflect a particular ideological stance, but it would be helpful to see a more comprehensive analysis that considers multiple viewpoints.
We’ve integrated libersave into our regional voucher system. It’s amazing how easily it allows us to consolidate various providers on a single platform.
Transgender madness refers to the proselytism under way in schools to push this agenda on children. Washington State, Oregon, California, Colorado and a few others are actively promoting this on other people’s children.
Google Olson Kennedy, a doctor at Children’s hospital in LA and see what she has been up to. she is being sued by a twenty year old woman who was given a double mastectomy at the age of fourteen.
Look up the case of Jeffrey Younger
who is fighting to stop the transition of his son. This is a guy who lost custody of his son and his ex wife is trying to transition their twelve year old into a girl.
Therapists, social workers, and others have supported the mother and the courts in Texas and California have ruled against Mr. younger.
Google Olson Kennedy on this blog and see my commentary on her. Google Abigail Shriner on this blog to see my review of her very informative book on how minor girls have been trapped in the trans craze.
On the neocons intervening in Church affairs, the consequences are enormous. When Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State decided to influence the Patriarch of Constantinople in recognizing the pseudo church in Ukraine he demonstrated that religious freedom is no really free. By influencing what he and others think the Ukrainian Church should be he undermined the beliefs of Orthodox Christians who believe the Church is headed by Christ. So, he gave his support to a make believe church with clergy who have no valid ordinations and no legitimacy. In Ukraine in particular, Orthodox in the legitimate are told they can only have legitimate religious freedom if they attend the artificially created church. Their choice is denied.
Even Orthodox Christians not in Ukraine such as myself are having our rights violated. I am under the Patriarch of Constantinople and I am outraged that Pompeo and others proceeded to interfere in the affairs of my Church for political reasons. The implications are enormous.
Long term consequences are uncertain. The short term consequences have been disastrous with the rupture in communion between Constantinople and Moscow.
I get your point about trying to be more balanced and I think this is helpful advice. I will try to be more balanced. Thank you for reading my blog and I enjoy reading your comments.