Categories
Letters

Letter to Bloomberg

Mr. Shipley,
The following is in response to the Bloomberg editorial that “Merkel can calm the conflict” between Greece and Turkey. The editorial advocates appeasement of Turkey by advocating membership for Turkey in the East Mediterranean Gas Forum. Greece happens to be entirely in the right in this conflict and is acting defensively to Turkish acts of aggression and provocation. The Erdogan government has for several years openly called for the eradication of the Treaty of Lausanne which defines the current boundaries between Greece and Turkey. President Erdogan and other Turkish officials and politicians have openly put forward claims to the Dodecanese islands that have been Hellenic since classical times and have belonged to present day Greece since 1947 through the signing of the Treaty of Paris. 


Furthermore, the editorial makes reference to the January 31,1996 crisis between Greece and Turkey which was instigated by the Turkish Government. The islet called “Imia” is a part of Greece without question and is according to Treaty of Paris a part of Greece. Criticism is given to the Trump administration which is unfavorably compared to the Clinton administrations so called “mediation” of 1996. In fact, the Trump administrations policy is an improvement fromthe Clinton administrations. The Clinton administration in effect bullied and pressured Greece into surrendering its own islet and withdrawing the Greek flag from its own territory. Such an agreement may have been to the satisfaction ofthe officials of the Clinton administration but not to Greece which was forced to surrender its own territory to the Turkish aggressors.


Turkey is presently being ruled by a lunatic who used to purchase oil from the Islamic State and permitted Jihadists from Europe to go through Turkey to join the Islamic State when that criminal entity was engaging in genocide against the Yazidi, Shiite, and Christian populations. The Trump administration should be criticized for betraying the Syrian Kurds and appeasing the Turks in Syria. The Trump administrations non intervention in the crisis between Greece and Turkey is oneof its better moments. Unlike the Clinton administration, the Trump administration so far has not bullied Greece into appeasing the mad man of Ankara.


Your editorial also fails to note that Erdogan and his close allies in the neo fascist action Party are praising the the slaughter of Greeks and Armenians in the Christian City of Smyrna in September 1922. Erdogan and others are in effect threateninga resumption of the genocide of 1914 and 1923 that led to the extermination of millions of Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks. Turkey is an international menace and has no business being invited to join any international organizations. Turkey should be considered an enemy of the civilized world and Greece should be fully backed and supported in defending its territorial integrity against the expansionist and jihadist regime in Ankara.
 

Theodore G. Karakostas 

Link to the Bloomberg article

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-09-07/merkel-can-calm-the-conflict-between-greece-and-turkey

Categories
Letters

Letter to my Congressman

Dear Congressman,
I am writing to express to you as an American of Greek descent that I believe the United States should give maximum support to our democratic allies Greece and Cyprus who are the victims of Turkish aggression and provocations. As is well known at the present time, Turkey is attempting to drill for oil in waters that are according to international law under the jurisdiction of Greece and Cyprus. The Turkish acts of aggression come in the aftermath of public statements made by the Turkish President himself that the Dodecanese islands that are off the coast of Asia Minor and belong to Greece under the Treaty of Paris of 1947 belong to Turkey. Such statements can only be construed as advocating ethnic cleansing and genocide as the population of these islands are overwhelmingly Greek and have not a single Turkish inhabitant residing on them. 

Turkey has publicly condemned the Treaty of Lausanne which defines the present day borders between Greece and Turkey. The Turkish President is a jihadist and a fanatic intent on creating a greater Islamic Turkey at the expense of Greece. It is inconceivable to contemplate that the United States will not support Greece during this crisis. The Turkey of President Recep Teyyip Erdogan is gradually filling the vacuum left by the destruction of the Islamic State (IS). As thatJihadist entity was eradicated, Ankara is now emerging as its successor Jihadist state. The Turkish government has converted old Churches such as the famed Hagia Sophia into Mosques and has held public parades glorifying the Ottoman Empire and Islamic triumphalism. 

Turkey continues to occupy thirty seven percent of the Republic of Cyprus. The greedy Jihadist Republic of Turkey seeks the oil that rightfully belongs to the people of the Republic of Cyprus. Having occupied the north of Cyprus and ethnically cleansed its territories of Greek Cypriots, Ankara is now seeking to seize the oil that belongs to the people of the internationally recognized and democratic Republic of Cyprus. The Turkish President has been adding fuel to the fire through his rhetoric by glorifying the racial extermination of Greek and Armenian Christians that occurred when Turkish forces seized that city from the Greek Army in September 1922. The Turkish President is a disturbed and dangerous individual that must be opposed by the civilized world.

 I respectfully call on you to raise the matter of Turkish aggression against Greece with your colleagues in the House of Representatives and with the President himself. I respectfully ask that you make an appeal to the President to extend full support to the democratic Republics of Greece and Cyprus and to condemn and oppose Turkey. It is my opinion that the United States should terminate all military and other forms of assistance that are being given to the Turkish Jihadist government. The White House and the State Department should be called upon by the House of Representatives to condemn Turkish acts of aggression, to cut off all forms of assistance to Turkey, and to take further necessary diplomatic and political actions to stop Turkish aggression and maintain peace and stability in the region. 

Respectfully,
Theodore G. Karakostas 

Categories
books

Genocide and the Turks

Book Review

The Thirty Year Genocide

by Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi

Harvard University Press. 2019

Turkish President Recep Teyyip Erdogan has followed the example of the leader of National Action Party ( the neo-fascist Grey Wolves) leader Devlet Bahceli and recalled the events at Smyrna which resulted in the mass slaughter of that city’s Greek and Armenian Christian inhabitants. Erdogan mentioned that Turkey would again drive the Greeks into the sea. For a country whose policies are heavily based on genocide denial, Turkey goes out of its way to actually remind the world not only of the genocide that its founders committed, but that it is willing to commit genocide again.

Turkey has lost the war that it spent many decades fighting by trying to impose its genocide denial on foreign countries and societies. That was has been lost as can be seen by the continued and unrelenting publication of books on the Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek genocides. Turkey had always been fighting a losing battle as its only real supporters in western governments and academic institutions were corrupt politicians and pseudo academics willing to come under Ankara’s influence for a price of some sort. Bernard Lewis is a perfect example.

In 2019, Israeli academics Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi published “The Thirty Year Genocide” a five hundred page tome documenting the systematic planning and carrying out of the physical extermination of the Ottoman Empire’s Christian populations. This book followed on the publication of “The Great Fire” by Lou Ureneck just a couple of years earlier which was about the slaughter of the Greeks and Armenians and the burning of Smyrna. There has never been any question as to the historical truth of what transpired in Anatolia between 1914 and 1923. When Turkish leaders open their big mouths making threats they are verifying the fact that their country has been built over the corpses of Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek Christians.

The authors of “The Thirty Year Genocide” spent seven years researching and writing this book. Their outstanding efforts show as this is simply a historical masterpiece. The authors recount in the introduction that Turkish governments over the decades have purged their historical archives of incriminating evidence. Turkish efforts to hide the truth have ended in miserable failure.

The authors in great detail recount the origins of genocide which they claim began against the Armenians in 1894. Over time, the policies of mass extermination were extended to the Greeks and Assyrians. Three governments in the Ottoman Empire were responsible- the government of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, the Young Turks, and Mustafa Kemal Pasha. Each government continued pursuing genocide as an instrument of state policy.

There are times when this book is tough to read. The pages at times endlessly describe the slaughter of Greeks and Armenians in village after village after village. They describe them in great detail and with statistics. This is a product of great historical research as well as political significance.

Israel for many years used its influence in Washington to stop the recognition of the Armenian genocide by the United States Congress. One has to wonder whether this book could have been published by two prominent Israeli historians had relations between Israel and Turkey not been damaged by the present leadership in Ankara. This is a wonderful and powerful contribution to the history of the Christians in the late Ottoman and early Republican eras in Turkish history.

This book has great political significance because unlike Germany which was occupied by the allies in 1945 and forced to undergo a policy of denazification, Turkey has never been forced or compelled to account for the horrors it inflicted on the Christian populations. As a result Greece, Cyprus, and Armenia today face threats of genocide by the Erdogan regime. Armenia in particular has been threatened by the lunatic regime in Azerbaijan which has threatened to attack Armenia’s nuclear power plant.

In recent days, the Greek government appointed an Ambassador to Azerbaijan. The Ambassador was in fact insulted by his hosts who made it clear that they stand firmly with Turkey on the matter of Ankara’s aggressive designs against Greece. It is abundantly clear that Turkey and Azerbaijan are being led by lunatics who are capable of and willing to resume genocidal operations against the descendants of the communities they exterminated one century ago.

Favorable reviews of this book were published in various American and British newspapers. Most important may have been the article about this book that appeared in the Wall Street Journal. The Journal was once one of the most staunchly pro Turkish newspapers in America. Its editorial writers served as apologists for the denial of the Armenian genocide and for the Turkish invasions of Cyprus.

They published a review of this book entitled “When Turkey killed its Christians” and recounted the genocide of the Armenians and Greeks. This is one example where the rise of Erdogan has led to a change in attitude toward Turkey. This past summer, National Review, another formerly pro Turkish publication made mention of the Armenian and Greek genocides.

Serious historians have worked hard for decades to expose the truth of genocide that was committed by the Turkish government. Their work has not been in vain. New generations of historians and scholars have come to assist the effort in liberating history from politics.

Categories
political

The danger of appeasement, Turkey, and shifting alliances

The NATO alliance is now seeking to “mediate” the crisis caused by Turkish aggression against Greece in the Mediterranean sea. Athens should look upon NATO plans with great skepticism and suspicion. In contrast to the European Union, and in contrast to the support for Greece from individual countries such as France and Italy, NATO has expressed no hitherto support for Greece.

The Mitsotakis government has handled this crisis well. After Turkey signed an agreement with Libya in effect partitioning the Mediterranean between them, Athens signed the EEZ agreement with Egypt. In addition to France and Italy, it appears the United Arab Emirates and even Saudi Arabia are adopting stances favorable to the Greek position.

Athens knows full well that the Erdogan government has put forward a claim on the Greek islands and has openly demanded a revision of the Treaty of Lausanne. Turkish claims to the continental shelf located under these islands and drilling for oil near them is an act of blatant aggression. NATO’s refusal to intervene until now is proof that NATO cannot be trusted.

It should not be forgotten that on January 31, 1996 Turkey claimed the Greek islet of Imia. Through the mediation of Undersecretary of State Richard Holbrooke the Greek flag was removed from the islet although the Treaty of Paris of 1947 clearly showed that Imia belonged to Greece. A New York Times editorial last weekend lamented the failure of the United States to “resolve” the present “crisis” in accordance with past “mediation” efforts such as that of January 31, 1996.

Athens would be making a great mistake if it agreed to anything that would concede to Turkey any of its rights. In all likelihood, the General Secretary of NATO will probably attempt to impose on Greece another “Imia” type solution. Greece should be ready for this and should reject any agreement that would compromise Greece’s rights.

The German newspaper, “Die Welt” reported that Turkish President Erdogan ordered the military to either sink a Greek ship or to shoot down a Greek helicopter without causing the loss of life! The Turkish Generals reportedly refused to follow the President’s orders. If this happens to be true it indicates that many in Turkey are skeptical of the Erdogan governments pro war policies and that divisions may exist in the formulation of policy.

Unlike in the past when Turkish aggression was manifest against Greece, Turkey has many more problems to cope with. In the past, Turkey’s problems were limited to the Kurdish question. Today, Turkey has many more problems that have to with the Kurds of Syria as well as their own Kurds. In addition, they have tensions with Syria as a result of the victory of the Syrian government in that countries civil war.

Turkey’s allies in the effort to overthrow the Asaad regime included Saudi Arabia. Now it appears that tensions exist between Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Turkey’s effort to emerge as the leader of the Sunni Muslim world has failed spectacularly.

The Greek City Times has reported that Russia has protested Greek media coverage asserting that Moscow supports Turkey in the present crisis, an accusation Moscow rejects. While the Russian ties with Turkey at this point should be of serious concern, it is a dangerous mistake for Greece to join the western demonization of Russia. It should be remembered that alliances throughout the crisis in Syria and the Middle East have shifted.

The Turkish government ordered the downing of a Russian plane in 2015 which nearly provoked a war with Russia and Turkey. Greeks need to remember that Athens rejected overtures from the Russians during this time and obeyed the dictates of the west. A Greek alliance with America and Europe against Turkey is welcome, Athens has to be careful to avoid participating in any actions against Russia and Iran which American officials seem to be attempting to drag Greece into.

American Ambassador to Greece Geoffrey Pyatt has praised Greece for keeping Russian influence out. The Greeks need to be concerned only about the Russian support for Turkey, and not the non existent efforts of Russian to establish influence in Greece. It should be remembered that Patriarch Bartholomew with the full backing of Washington along with some compromised Bishops from the Church of Greece have supported the persecution of Moscow’s Orthodox Church in Ukraine at the request of the State Department.

In 2021, Greece will commemorate two anniversaries. Greeks will celebrate the two hundredth anniversary of the Greek War of Independence. Less likely to be highlighted next August will be the nine hundred and fifty year anniversary of the Battle of Manzikert where the Seljuk Turks defeated the Byzantine armies and seized a huge portion of Anatolia. The Greek world has been at the mercy of the Turk ever since.

Greek national ambitions should be aimed at eradicating the Turkish threat. The Mitsotakis government has presently put Turkey at the forefront of its foreign policy. For this, the Prime Minister and his foreign policy and defense advisors deserve praise. It has been decades since Greece had a government that was based on Greek nationalism rather than the internationalist agenda that was at the forefront of the agenda of the leftist Socialist Party.

Greece’s foreign policy must remained focused on Turkey. Its foreign relations with America, Europe, Russia, Israel, and the Arab world should depend on the status of their relationship with Turkey. Greece should strengthen its ties with those countries that are hostile to Turkey. Considering Russia’s ties with Turkey, it is reasonable for Athens to cool its relationship with Moscow.

But that relationship should be cooled on the basis only of Russian support for Turkey, and not because America and Europe do not like Russia. Greece needs to be careful and to select its fights very carefully and selectively. It should commit itself only to an alliance that is anti Turkish.

It is entirely possible that the Turkish government could succeed in following the example of the Young Turks during the First World War and succeed in alienating both the West and Russia. This would be the ideal. Turkey today is evolving into a Jihadist state that threatens everybody.

Before the Greek media joins in the demonization of Russia it should take into consideration the downing of the Russian plane in 2015, and the assassination of the Russian Ambassador by a Turkish Jihadist. In the past decade, Erdogan’s Turkey has nearly started a war with Israel (the flotilla incident), Russia, and the United States (in Syria). While it is disappointing that none of these three countries maintained a principled stance against Turkish aggression, precedents have been set for a future Turkish provocation against one or all of the above.

The present Turkish President has demonstrated an inability to engage rationally with other countries. Sooner or later, he is going to provoke a conflict with one of the above governments that will lead to serious repercussions for Ankara. In the meantime, Greece should maintain its principled policies and reject any attempt by NATO to force Athens to surrender its rights.

The Erdogan leadership survived coup attempts in 2004 and 2016. In all likelihood it can only be removed by power from without. As unlikely as it seems now, should Ankara continue to provoke and to meddle, the prospect of a foreign intervention in Turkey cannot be ruled out over the long term.

Categories
Letters

Letter to the New York Times


The following letter is in response to the August 30 editorial, “There’s a new game of thrones in the mediterranean”. The Times editorial concedes that international law is on the side of Greece, but seemingly advocates the appeasement of Turkey. Furthermore, many of the facts recounted by the editorial make the case for supporting Greece against Turkey as Ankara is very clearly a major threat to international peace and stability. Turkey’s threats to unleash unlimited numbers of refugees into Europe should further the case for supporting Greece in the Mediterranean. The western world has wronged the historical victims of Turkish genocide and aggression including the Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, Kurds, and Arabs. America and Europe have a crucial opportunity to correct these injustices and to demonstrate their support for democratic norms and values by supporting democratic Greece and Cyprus against an increasingly authoritarian Turkey.

The Times editorial criticizes the Trump administration for not emulating the previous handling of crises between Greece and Turkey by previous administrations. This argument completely ignores the fact that every previous “resolution” aimed allegedly at defusing conflict between Athens and Ankara resulted in sacrificing Greece and Cyprus to the aggressive designs of Turkey. On January 31, 1996 the Clinton administration forced Greece to remove its flag from an islet that maps and international treaties proved was Greek territory. Such “solutions” were in actual fact nothing more than appeasement. Nothing better demonstrates the moral bankruptcy of the handling of Greek-Turkish conflicts any better than the fact that Turkey maintains its occupation of the northern part of Cyprus almost fifty years after the invasions of that sovereign Republic by Turkish forces. 


The Turkish regime under President Erdogan is an international threat to peace and stability. Greece deserves full support from all governments and alliances that claim to espouse international law and democratic values and norms.

Theodore G. Karakostas 

The link to the article being responded to

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/30/opinion/turkey-greece-oil-gas.html

Categories
political

Hagia Sophia Diaries 17

The Turkish government now requires all female visitors to Hagia Sophia to wear headscarves and to cover their legs. The government had given assurance that visitors could visit Hagia Sophia for free, but anyone who is not properly dressed must now pay to purchase coverings in order to enter Hagia Sophia. Throughout much of the Muslim world their continues to be praise for the Turkish government for its actions in converting Hagia Sophia.

The support of Palestinian groups for the conversion of Hagia Sophia and Turkey should be seen by Greeks as a signal that alliances are changing. Greece and Cyprus have been establishing better relations with Israel over the last decade or so, and this must continue. Greece must view any and all governments that support the conversion of Hagia Sophia in an unfriendly light.

The Greek Foreign Ministry should call diplomats from those countries to raise a formal protest over their public support for the conversion of Hagia Sophia. The Ministry of Culture should also begin putting pressure on UNESCO to take a more aggressive stance on the issue. UNESCO sent one letter of protest to the Turkish government and went silent again.

The further conversion of the the Church of the savior at Chora indicates that the conversion of Church-Museums in Turkey may not stop. The Greek world, the international media, and cultural institutions waited much too long to respond to these Turkish provocations. This is a process that began in 2013 with the conversion of the Church-Museum of Hagia Sophia in Trebizond.

As far as the international reaction is concerned, better late than never. However, the danger now is that the media and cultural organizations will simply accept what Turkey has done and will go back to sleep. There needs to be a continued reaction of protests and boycotts of Turkey at all levels.

Greece should also make it clear to any country that has praised the actions of the Erdogan government that this will lead to a deterioration of relations with that particular country. Hagia Sophia can never be considered a Mosque as its Christian origins are beyond dispute. The Erdogan government’s conversion of all Churches since 2013 constitute acts of aggression.

Those governments which supported these acts of provocation display an unfriendly attitude toward Greece. The Greek Foreign Ministry should convey this stance to the diplomats of those countries that are stationed in Athens.

Categories
Letters

Letter to the Art Newspaper

The following is in response to the piece by Holger A. Klein in the Turkish conversion of the Savior Church of Chora. As a Greek Orthodox author of three books and various articles I can only say to academics such as Mr. Klein that present criticisms of the Turkish government are too little, too late. The Turkish government in 2013 converted the Church of Hagia Sophia in Trebizond into a Mosque. No one took any notice and no one protested the outrage.

The Turkish authorities proceeded to convert at least two more Church-Museums named Hagia Sophia in Nicea (Iznik) and Adrianople (Edirne) without any protests.As an Orthodox Greek, I made phone calls to the UNESCO offices in New York and sent them emails bringing to their attention the Turkish conversion of the above mentioned Church-Museums and their ultimate goal for the conversion of Hagia Sophia of Constantinople. During the summer of 2014 I visited a UNESCO office in Athens and in March 2015 I visited the UNESCO headquarters in Paris to raise attention to the Turkish plans for the conversion of Hagia Sophia. I was given repeated assurances that UNESCO authorities had been in touch with Turkish officials and had been “assured” by them that Hagia Sophia would be left unmolested.  

One year later during the spring of 2016 Hagia Sophia of Constantinople was used for Muslim prayers. No protests from UNESCO, and certainly no protests from the academic community. Perhaps Mr. Klein can tell me where his voice was over the past seven years as the movement to convert Hagia Sophia was gaining steam? Where were the voices and protests from the academic community? There is no shortage of protests now that the evil deeds have been carried out but where were the protests and the outrages when they would have made a difference?


There are certain inaccuracies in the article by Mr. Klein. Mr. Klein refers to Hagia Sophia as a Mosque. Let us understand that Hagia Sophia of Constantinople and other Hagia Sophia Churches, along with the Church of the Savior at Chora are CHURCHES, not Mosques. Thomas Wittemore of the Byzantine Institute could have referred to them as Mosques because they were in use as such during the period of time he expressed concern about them. However, let it not be forgotten the Christian temples that are falling victim to the predatory government of Turkey are Churches, not Mosques. Mosques do not have images of the incarnate God and savior Jesus Christ, the most Holy Theotokos andMother of God, and the Holy Apostles and fathers of the Church within them. 


Certainly, Christians recognize the importance of these Churches to secular history but the sacred and divine origins of these great Christian temples must not be dismissed or disrespected. Without the Holy Gospel there would be no Hagia Sophia. Hagia Sophia and the Church of Chora can never be Mosques or Museums. Their roots lie with the divinity of the God-Man Jesus Christ who became incarnate in the flesh. Hagia Sophia is a Church and it is highly offensive that the article by Mr. Klein minimized the Christian origins of the Byzantine Churches mentioned in his commentary.

Criticism of the Turkish government even at this late date is welcome. However, the academic community and UNESCO should recognize they made mistakes and waited too long to protest the Turkish aggression against Hagia Sophia.They should also make sure to be historically, culturally, and theologically accurate when discussing these Church-Museums as they were founded as Christian Cathedrals and Churches. Referring to them as Mosques in the context in which Mr. Klein writes does a disservice to Orthodox Christians who are the real guardians of Hagia Sophia and inadvertently strengthens the case of the Turkish government. 


The case against the Erdogan government’s conversion of these Byzantine Churches lies not with the legacy of Mustafa Kemal (the so called “Ataturk) but with those of the Byzantine Emperors of Constantinople such as Saint Justinian who presided over the construction of these miraculous temples for the purpose of worshipping the Triune God. Saint Justinian the Great who presided over the construction of Hagia Sophia is not even mentioned in the article by Mr.Klein while the so called “Ataturk” who was the architect of the genocide of Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek Christians is given undue prominence.

Certainly, the appeal to stop the conversion of Church-Museums into Mosques can be made on the basis of cultural and historical sensitivities, but the theological and spiritual roots of these Churches are the greatest reasons why the Turkish government’s actions should be condemned.

Theodore G. Karakostas

Link to the article being responded to

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/comment/istanbul-s-exceptional-cultural-heritage-must-not-be-lost

Categories
Further interest

Church of the Savior in Chora News Sources

The following post contains links that follow developments with regard to the Church of the savior at Chora

Updated on December 26, 2020

The Art Newspaper

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/comment/istanbul-s-exceptional-cultural-heritage-must-not-be-lost

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/erdogan-ruling-puts-sistine-chapel-of-byzantium-at-risk-critics-say

Orthodox Churches on Chora Church

http://www.patriarchia.ru/en/db/text/5681788.html

https://orthodoxtimes.com/russian-foreign-ministry-the-chora-church-is-one-of-the-most-important-unesco-monuments/

News Outlets

https://greekcitytimes.com/2020/10/28/chora-church-covered-turkish-authorities/

https://orthodoxtimes.com/erdogan-will-pray-at-chora-church-on-october-30/

https://scroll.in/article/973364/as-erdogan-converts-byzantine-churches-into-mosques-there-is-more-at-stake-than-just-the-monuments

https://www.dw.com/en/like-hagia-sophia-turkey-to-reconvert-chora-museum-into-mosque/a-54713753

https://www.foxnews.com/world/hagia-sophia-turkey-museum-turned-into-mosque

UNESCO

https://bianet.org/english/religion/235454-report-unesco-applies-to-inspect-hagia-sophia-chora-after-conversion

Categories
books

The legacy of the Colonels

Book Review

The Greek Connection The Life of Elias Demetracopoulos And the Untold Story of Watergate by James H. Barron

Melville House 2020

Just as one has come to believe that the story of the Greek military dictatorship(s) from 1967 to 1974 has been fully told, a new account of that era has been put fourth that focuses on the heroic activities of journalist Elias Demetracopoulos. This is a very good book that tells a very important story and serves to remind Greeks of the way in which Greece has been mistreated by the great powers. This book is not only a fine work of history but an important contribution to the historical understanding of the nature of Greek politics and the politics and diplomacy of the American foreign policy establishment.

The release of this book comes at a time when political extremism veers toward the left wing of the political spectrum. This book is an important reminder of the time in both Greece and America when extremism veered toward the right wing. The story of Mr. Demetracopoulos is told and it is a very heroic one.

Elias Demetracopoulos was a boy in Nazi occupied Greece who resisted the Germans and was imprisoned. He became a very successful and prominent journalist in Greece who clashed with several American ambassadors. This was the period in history when the American government interfered in Greek internal affairs (and still does to a certain extent).

Elias Demetracopoulos established contacts not only in Greece but in the United States in which he took refuge following the imposition of the military dictatorship on Greece in April 1967. What is truly amazing is the slander that was directed against this moderate opponent of the Papadopoulos dictatorship. This journalist was moderate in his politics and was opposed to communism as well as the neo-fascism of the Colonels.

In America he established contacts with many prominent journalists, politicians, and military officials. Many of these individuals were staunch conservatives. This included the late Robert Novak and the late Rowland Evans. This biography of Elias Dematracopoulos is an affirmation that the Coup of 1967 was not about preventing the imposition of communist totalitarianism on Greece, but on eradicating the sovereignty and independence of Greece and eradicating Greek democracy.

This book recounts what has been previously documented regarding dictator George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos was a Nazi collaborator during the Second World War who served in the security battalions under the collaborationist government. Furthermore, as a working journalist in Athens Dematracopoulos infuriated Greek Prime Minister Constantine Karamanlis for revealing that America had installed nuclear weapons in Greece.

Dematracopoulos informed the Greek people about nuclear weapons in their country and the prospective consequences in the event of a confrontation with the Soviet Union in which Greece would have played a prominent offensive role and would have served as a prime target for Moscow. This revelation was a serious wake up call considering present day efforts of American officials in Athens such as Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt to promote conflict between Greece and present day Russia. Many things in the relationship between Greece and the United States have changed for the better and some things have not changed.

The most significant change from the era recounted in the book is that democracy in Greece has been for most part irreversible. There are two events in the past decade or so in which Greek democracy has been challenged. The first incident occurred in 2008 when the Government of Prime Minister Constantine Karamanlis (the nephew and namesake of the aforementioned Prime Minister) came under pressure to resign in the aftermath of an effort to establish an oil pipeline agreement with Russia and Bulgaria. Incidents such as these along with the collusion of the Simitis government in 1999 which surrendered Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan to the Turks indicate that the restoration of Greek sovereignty in the post dictatorship era has not been one hundred percent successful.

A second challenge to Greek democracy came from the rise of Golden Dawn in the elections of 2012. The legacy of the Greek dictatorship can be judged by its present day sympathizers. Only Golden Dawn expresses admiration for the Papadopoulos regime. Golden Dawn is a Neo-Nazi organization that promotes holocaust denial, anti semitism and other forms of racism, and neo paganism.

In the past two years, Greece has overcome both right wing extremism (Golden Dawn) and left wing extremism (the Marxist Syriza Party). The downfall of Syriza and the complete collapse of Golden Dawn bode well for the future of Greece. Liberal democracy appears to have recovered nicely under the leadership of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis.

The book recounts many troubling facts regarding the Greek dictatorship. For example, many Greek Americans supported the regime. The Nixon administration comes off as as especially vile in its disregard for the sadistic torture and brutality against political dissidents in Greece. There was a prominent Greek American who served as a supporter of both the dictatorship and the Nixon administration who comes off very poorly.

Theories abound that there was a Greek connection to Watergate. The Watergate break in may have been because the Colonels contributed $500,000 dollars to the Nixon campaign in 1968. Elias Demetracopoulos had sent evidence of this to the chairman of the Democratic Party and it is speculated this is what the Watergate burglars were looking for. The cash that the Colonels contributed to the Nixon campaign may very well have been from American aid from taxpayers which would have consisted of American taxpayers cash being used for partisan political purposes in funding the campaign of Richard Nixon.

Elias Demetracopoulos worked tirelessly against the Colonels as well as against the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department which not only slandered him but threatened to have him deported back to Athens. When the Greek journalist’s father was on his death bed, Demetracopoulos reached out to his political friends in Washington for help in obtaining safe passage for him to visit his father. He was warned by Senator Edward Kennedy to reject any offers of safe passage as such an offer would be a trick by the Colonels to lure him to Athens.

Mention is made of Henry Kissinger. This book very effectively conveys to the reader why Greeks absolutely loathe this former Secretary of State. Kissinger is a horrible human being and every new revelation regarding Greece and Cyprus at this time only reaffirms what a monster this man really is. Elias Dematracopoulos was friends with the late Christopher Hitchens. No one has ever done as much to expose Kissinger as Hitchens who publicly denounced him as a “war criminal” and called for him to be put on trial.

Mention is made of the events in Cyprus during the summer of 1974 and the role of Kissinger in the attempted ouster of President Makarios of Cyprus and the subsequent Turkish invasions. There is interesting information on how the Greek American community came together in 1974 to demand that Congress impose an arms embargo on Turkey. That achievement was one of the finest accomplishments of the Greek American community.

The book accurately describes the pro Turkish tilt of American administrations. It is recounted that the Greek American community supported the election of Jimmy Carter only to be disappointed by that administration which maintained support for Turkey over Greece. The support for the military dictatorship in Greece was never pro Greek but an effort to impose western dictates on Greece.

The real disregard that Washington had for Greece came to be seen after the overthrow of George Papadopoulos by another dictator Dimitrios Ioannides and following the restoration of Greek democracy when the elder Karamanlis returned to Greece. Kissinger made it very clear to the Ford administration that replaced the Nixon administration that Turkey was more important than Greece.

In the year 2020, things have changed. Most changes have been relatively positive. Some negatives remain such as the aforementioned strangle hold that Washington has over Greek foreign policy. The most important difference in relations between Athens and Washington today is that Turkey has lost its strategic value.

Turkey has defected from the western alliance and in its provocations of Greece, Athens seems to have American support. The challenge for Greeks is to win over the United States as a real and genuine ally in point of fact and not just on paper. If the United States commits itself fully to the isolation of Turkey and the territorial, legal, and moral rights of Greece and Cyprus all the negative connotations of past relations between Washington and Athens may disappear.

The late Elias Demetracopoulos is a very heroic figure who fought valiantly for the liberation of Greece from dictatorship and lobbied hard after the anti Makarios Coup in Cyprus to prevent the Turkish invasions. He established friendships with American conservatives and liberal alike. It is not likely that prominent Republican conservatives and military officials would have remained friends with someone who was a “communist”.

The end of the economic crisis in Greece and the rapid disappearance of Golden Dawn indicates that Greek politics have been stabilized. Greece does not need the likes of Golden Dawn or the Colonels which that party has repeatedly praised. In terms of national interest, the Colonels not only left Greece in a pathetically weakened state, they abandoned Cyprus to the Turks.

A previous work on the Colonels regime entitled, “The Rape of Greece” by Peter Murtagh published in 1994 recounted that the Colonels promoted “double enosis” for Cyprus. In other words, what the Turks called “taksim”meaning partition. It should not be forgotten that the Colonels betrayed both Greece and Cyprus.

This biography of Elias Demetracopoulos by James H. Barron has a great deal to commend it. The ongoing activities of Congress, the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department, and the media are all recounted here. Vivid examples are also given with regard to the collaboration between the foreign policy apparatus in Washington and various newspapers and media outlets. Many journalists acted in ways that were not in accordance with the objective aims of their profession.

In conclusion, this is a fine book on modern Greek history as well as on American foreign policy. Elias Demetracopoulos is an example of a Greek success story who was able to make a difference and to contribute greatly to the demise of the Colonels. He was not only a superb journalist but demonstrated great diplomatic prowess by alliances he established with many on both sides of the political spectrum.

His example should serve to inspire Greek Americans in their struggles to build support for Greece and Cyprus.

Categories
faith

Hagia Sophia Diaries 16

The Orthodox Times has criticized the Moscow Patriarchate by accusing the Russian Church of “attacking” the Ecumenical Patriarchate. This is in fact untrue. The Russian Church has criticized the Turkish government for the most recent outrage of the Erdogan government which has converted the historic Church of the Savior at Chora.

The Russian Church stated that the Ecumenical Patriarchate was not content with being “first among equals” and created division. This is true considering the destruction and chaos that has ensued in Ukraine. The canonical Ukrainian Church is facing persecution from schismatics linked to extremist groups.

All this is true, and it is to the credit of the Russian Church that it has condemned the conversion of the Chora Church as it has the conversion of Hagia Sophia. This latest outrage on the part of the Turkish authorities is further evidence that the schism in Orthodoxy over the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s intervention in Ukraine must come to an end. The Greek world faces serious threats from Turkey, including Ankara’s territorial claims on the Greek islands and the continental shelf.

The Greek world does not need the schism and its aftereffects. The Ecumenical Patriarch needs to settle this schism by convening a Pan Orthodox Council that would rule on the Ukrainian situation. It should be remembered that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo encouraged Patriarch Bartholomew to invade the Russian Church’s territory in Ukraine.

What exactly has the State Department done to save Hagia Sophia or the Christ the Savior Church in Chora? It should be remembered that the State Department under John Foster Dulles in 1955 failed to even condemn the anti Greek pogroms in Constantinople that set the stage for the destruction of the Patriarchate’s flock. The State Department has done nothing for the theological school of Halki either.

The Greek world is suffering the loss of important shrines in Constantinople. Both Greece and Cyprus are are the targets of Turkish aggression. The Greek world needs to remain on friendly terms with America, Russia, Europe, and other parties in order to resist Turkey.

Resolving the Ukrainian Church dispute according to the ruling of a pan Orthodox synod will remove a spiritual crisis from the Greek Churches and restore their relations with the Russian Church and the other local Churches. It is time to end this Ukrainian Church crisis and for Constantinople’s “supporters” to stop with the cheap shots at the Russian Church.