Categories
Letters

Letter to the Art Newspaper

The following is in response to the piece by Holger A. Klein in the Turkish conversion of the Savior Church of Chora. As a Greek Orthodox author of three books and various articles I can only say to academics such as Mr. Klein that present criticisms of the Turkish government are too little, too late. The Turkish government in 2013 converted the Church of Hagia Sophia in Trebizond into a Mosque. No one took any notice and no one protested the outrage.

The Turkish authorities proceeded to convert at least two more Church-Museums named Hagia Sophia in Nicea (Iznik) and Adrianople (Edirne) without any protests.As an Orthodox Greek, I made phone calls to the UNESCO offices in New York and sent them emails bringing to their attention the Turkish conversion of the above mentioned Church-Museums and their ultimate goal for the conversion of Hagia Sophia of Constantinople. During the summer of 2014 I visited a UNESCO office in Athens and in March 2015 I visited the UNESCO headquarters in Paris to raise attention to the Turkish plans for the conversion of Hagia Sophia. I was given repeated assurances that UNESCO authorities had been in touch with Turkish officials and had been “assured” by them that Hagia Sophia would be left unmolested.  

One year later during the spring of 2016 Hagia Sophia of Constantinople was used for Muslim prayers. No protests from UNESCO, and certainly no protests from the academic community. Perhaps Mr. Klein can tell me where his voice was over the past seven years as the movement to convert Hagia Sophia was gaining steam? Where were the voices and protests from the academic community? There is no shortage of protests now that the evil deeds have been carried out but where were the protests and the outrages when they would have made a difference?


There are certain inaccuracies in the article by Mr. Klein. Mr. Klein refers to Hagia Sophia as a Mosque. Let us understand that Hagia Sophia of Constantinople and other Hagia Sophia Churches, along with the Church of the Savior at Chora are CHURCHES, not Mosques. Thomas Wittemore of the Byzantine Institute could have referred to them as Mosques because they were in use as such during the period of time he expressed concern about them. However, let it not be forgotten the Christian temples that are falling victim to the predatory government of Turkey are Churches, not Mosques. Mosques do not have images of the incarnate God and savior Jesus Christ, the most Holy Theotokos andMother of God, and the Holy Apostles and fathers of the Church within them. 


Certainly, Christians recognize the importance of these Churches to secular history but the sacred and divine origins of these great Christian temples must not be dismissed or disrespected. Without the Holy Gospel there would be no Hagia Sophia. Hagia Sophia and the Church of Chora can never be Mosques or Museums. Their roots lie with the divinity of the God-Man Jesus Christ who became incarnate in the flesh. Hagia Sophia is a Church and it is highly offensive that the article by Mr. Klein minimized the Christian origins of the Byzantine Churches mentioned in his commentary.

Criticism of the Turkish government even at this late date is welcome. However, the academic community and UNESCO should recognize they made mistakes and waited too long to protest the Turkish aggression against Hagia Sophia.They should also make sure to be historically, culturally, and theologically accurate when discussing these Church-Museums as they were founded as Christian Cathedrals and Churches. Referring to them as Mosques in the context in which Mr. Klein writes does a disservice to Orthodox Christians who are the real guardians of Hagia Sophia and inadvertently strengthens the case of the Turkish government. 


The case against the Erdogan government’s conversion of these Byzantine Churches lies not with the legacy of Mustafa Kemal (the so called “Ataturk) but with those of the Byzantine Emperors of Constantinople such as Saint Justinian who presided over the construction of these miraculous temples for the purpose of worshipping the Triune God. Saint Justinian the Great who presided over the construction of Hagia Sophia is not even mentioned in the article by Mr.Klein while the so called “Ataturk” who was the architect of the genocide of Armenian, Assyrian, and Greek Christians is given undue prominence.

Certainly, the appeal to stop the conversion of Church-Museums into Mosques can be made on the basis of cultural and historical sensitivities, but the theological and spiritual roots of these Churches are the greatest reasons why the Turkish government’s actions should be condemned.

Theodore G. Karakostas

Link to the article being responded to

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/comment/istanbul-s-exceptional-cultural-heritage-must-not-be-lost

Categories
Further interest

Church of the Savior in Chora News Sources

The following post contains links that follow developments with regard to the Church of the savior at Chora

Updated on December 26, 2020

The Art Newspaper

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/comment/istanbul-s-exceptional-cultural-heritage-must-not-be-lost

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/erdogan-ruling-puts-sistine-chapel-of-byzantium-at-risk-critics-say

Orthodox Churches on Chora Church

http://www.patriarchia.ru/en/db/text/5681788.html

https://orthodoxtimes.com/russian-foreign-ministry-the-chora-church-is-one-of-the-most-important-unesco-monuments/

News Outlets

https://greekcitytimes.com/2020/10/28/chora-church-covered-turkish-authorities/

https://orthodoxtimes.com/erdogan-will-pray-at-chora-church-on-october-30/

https://scroll.in/article/973364/as-erdogan-converts-byzantine-churches-into-mosques-there-is-more-at-stake-than-just-the-monuments

https://www.dw.com/en/like-hagia-sophia-turkey-to-reconvert-chora-museum-into-mosque/a-54713753

https://www.foxnews.com/world/hagia-sophia-turkey-museum-turned-into-mosque

UNESCO

https://bianet.org/english/religion/235454-report-unesco-applies-to-inspect-hagia-sophia-chora-after-conversion

Categories
books

The legacy of the Colonels

Book Review

The Greek Connection The Life of Elias Demetracopoulos And the Untold Story of Watergate by James H. Barron

Melville House 2020

Just as one has come to believe that the story of the Greek military dictatorship(s) from 1967 to 1974 has been fully told, a new account of that era has been put fourth that focuses on the heroic activities of journalist Elias Demetracopoulos. This is a very good book that tells a very important story and serves to remind Greeks of the way in which Greece has been mistreated by the great powers. This book is not only a fine work of history but an important contribution to the historical understanding of the nature of Greek politics and the politics and diplomacy of the American foreign policy establishment.

The release of this book comes at a time when political extremism veers toward the left wing of the political spectrum. This book is an important reminder of the time in both Greece and America when extremism veered toward the right wing. The story of Mr. Demetracopoulos is told and it is a very heroic one.

Elias Demetracopoulos was a boy in Nazi occupied Greece who resisted the Germans and was imprisoned. He became a very successful and prominent journalist in Greece who clashed with several American ambassadors. This was the period in history when the American government interfered in Greek internal affairs (and still does to a certain extent).

Elias Demetracopoulos established contacts not only in Greece but in the United States in which he took refuge following the imposition of the military dictatorship on Greece in April 1967. What is truly amazing is the slander that was directed against this moderate opponent of the Papadopoulos dictatorship. This journalist was moderate in his politics and was opposed to communism as well as the neo-fascism of the Colonels.

In America he established contacts with many prominent journalists, politicians, and military officials. Many of these individuals were staunch conservatives. This included the late Robert Novak and the late Rowland Evans. This biography of Elias Dematracopoulos is an affirmation that the Coup of 1967 was not about preventing the imposition of communist totalitarianism on Greece, but on eradicating the sovereignty and independence of Greece and eradicating Greek democracy.

This book recounts what has been previously documented regarding dictator George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos was a Nazi collaborator during the Second World War who served in the security battalions under the collaborationist government. Furthermore, as a working journalist in Athens Dematracopoulos infuriated Greek Prime Minister Constantine Karamanlis for revealing that America had installed nuclear weapons in Greece.

Dematracopoulos informed the Greek people about nuclear weapons in their country and the prospective consequences in the event of a confrontation with the Soviet Union in which Greece would have played a prominent offensive role and would have served as a prime target for Moscow. This revelation was a serious wake up call considering present day efforts of American officials in Athens such as Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt to promote conflict between Greece and present day Russia. Many things in the relationship between Greece and the United States have changed for the better and some things have not changed.

The most significant change from the era recounted in the book is that democracy in Greece has been for most part irreversible. There are two events in the past decade or so in which Greek democracy has been challenged. The first incident occurred in 2008 when the Government of Prime Minister Constantine Karamanlis (the nephew and namesake of the aforementioned Prime Minister) came under pressure to resign in the aftermath of an effort to establish an oil pipeline agreement with Russia and Bulgaria. Incidents such as these along with the collusion of the Simitis government in 1999 which surrendered Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan to the Turks indicate that the restoration of Greek sovereignty in the post dictatorship era has not been one hundred percent successful.

A second challenge to Greek democracy came from the rise of Golden Dawn in the elections of 2012. The legacy of the Greek dictatorship can be judged by its present day sympathizers. Only Golden Dawn expresses admiration for the Papadopoulos regime. Golden Dawn is a Neo-Nazi organization that promotes holocaust denial, anti semitism and other forms of racism, and neo paganism.

In the past two years, Greece has overcome both right wing extremism (Golden Dawn) and left wing extremism (the Marxist Syriza Party). The downfall of Syriza and the complete collapse of Golden Dawn bode well for the future of Greece. Liberal democracy appears to have recovered nicely under the leadership of Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis.

The book recounts many troubling facts regarding the Greek dictatorship. For example, many Greek Americans supported the regime. The Nixon administration comes off as as especially vile in its disregard for the sadistic torture and brutality against political dissidents in Greece. There was a prominent Greek American who served as a supporter of both the dictatorship and the Nixon administration who comes off very poorly.

Theories abound that there was a Greek connection to Watergate. The Watergate break in may have been because the Colonels contributed $500,000 dollars to the Nixon campaign in 1968. Elias Demetracopoulos had sent evidence of this to the chairman of the Democratic Party and it is speculated this is what the Watergate burglars were looking for. The cash that the Colonels contributed to the Nixon campaign may very well have been from American aid from taxpayers which would have consisted of American taxpayers cash being used for partisan political purposes in funding the campaign of Richard Nixon.

Elias Demetracopoulos worked tirelessly against the Colonels as well as against the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department which not only slandered him but threatened to have him deported back to Athens. When the Greek journalist’s father was on his death bed, Demetracopoulos reached out to his political friends in Washington for help in obtaining safe passage for him to visit his father. He was warned by Senator Edward Kennedy to reject any offers of safe passage as such an offer would be a trick by the Colonels to lure him to Athens.

Mention is made of Henry Kissinger. This book very effectively conveys to the reader why Greeks absolutely loathe this former Secretary of State. Kissinger is a horrible human being and every new revelation regarding Greece and Cyprus at this time only reaffirms what a monster this man really is. Elias Dematracopoulos was friends with the late Christopher Hitchens. No one has ever done as much to expose Kissinger as Hitchens who publicly denounced him as a “war criminal” and called for him to be put on trial.

Mention is made of the events in Cyprus during the summer of 1974 and the role of Kissinger in the attempted ouster of President Makarios of Cyprus and the subsequent Turkish invasions. There is interesting information on how the Greek American community came together in 1974 to demand that Congress impose an arms embargo on Turkey. That achievement was one of the finest accomplishments of the Greek American community.

The book accurately describes the pro Turkish tilt of American administrations. It is recounted that the Greek American community supported the election of Jimmy Carter only to be disappointed by that administration which maintained support for Turkey over Greece. The support for the military dictatorship in Greece was never pro Greek but an effort to impose western dictates on Greece.

The real disregard that Washington had for Greece came to be seen after the overthrow of George Papadopoulos by another dictator Dimitrios Ioannides and following the restoration of Greek democracy when the elder Karamanlis returned to Greece. Kissinger made it very clear to the Ford administration that replaced the Nixon administration that Turkey was more important than Greece.

In the year 2020, things have changed. Most changes have been relatively positive. Some negatives remain such as the aforementioned strangle hold that Washington has over Greek foreign policy. The most important difference in relations between Athens and Washington today is that Turkey has lost its strategic value.

Turkey has defected from the western alliance and in its provocations of Greece, Athens seems to have American support. The challenge for Greeks is to win over the United States as a real and genuine ally in point of fact and not just on paper. If the United States commits itself fully to the isolation of Turkey and the territorial, legal, and moral rights of Greece and Cyprus all the negative connotations of past relations between Washington and Athens may disappear.

The late Elias Demetracopoulos is a very heroic figure who fought valiantly for the liberation of Greece from dictatorship and lobbied hard after the anti Makarios Coup in Cyprus to prevent the Turkish invasions. He established friendships with American conservatives and liberal alike. It is not likely that prominent Republican conservatives and military officials would have remained friends with someone who was a “communist”.

The end of the economic crisis in Greece and the rapid disappearance of Golden Dawn indicates that Greek politics have been stabilized. Greece does not need the likes of Golden Dawn or the Colonels which that party has repeatedly praised. In terms of national interest, the Colonels not only left Greece in a pathetically weakened state, they abandoned Cyprus to the Turks.

A previous work on the Colonels regime entitled, “The Rape of Greece” by Peter Murtagh published in 1994 recounted that the Colonels promoted “double enosis” for Cyprus. In other words, what the Turks called “taksim”meaning partition. It should not be forgotten that the Colonels betrayed both Greece and Cyprus.

This biography of Elias Demetracopoulos by James H. Barron has a great deal to commend it. The ongoing activities of Congress, the Central Intelligence Agency, the State Department, and the media are all recounted here. Vivid examples are also given with regard to the collaboration between the foreign policy apparatus in Washington and various newspapers and media outlets. Many journalists acted in ways that were not in accordance with the objective aims of their profession.

In conclusion, this is a fine book on modern Greek history as well as on American foreign policy. Elias Demetracopoulos is an example of a Greek success story who was able to make a difference and to contribute greatly to the demise of the Colonels. He was not only a superb journalist but demonstrated great diplomatic prowess by alliances he established with many on both sides of the political spectrum.

His example should serve to inspire Greek Americans in their struggles to build support for Greece and Cyprus.

Categories
faith

Hagia Sophia Diaries 16

The Orthodox Times has criticized the Moscow Patriarchate by accusing the Russian Church of “attacking” the Ecumenical Patriarchate. This is in fact untrue. The Russian Church has criticized the Turkish government for the most recent outrage of the Erdogan government which has converted the historic Church of the Savior at Chora.

The Russian Church stated that the Ecumenical Patriarchate was not content with being “first among equals” and created division. This is true considering the destruction and chaos that has ensued in Ukraine. The canonical Ukrainian Church is facing persecution from schismatics linked to extremist groups.

All this is true, and it is to the credit of the Russian Church that it has condemned the conversion of the Chora Church as it has the conversion of Hagia Sophia. This latest outrage on the part of the Turkish authorities is further evidence that the schism in Orthodoxy over the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s intervention in Ukraine must come to an end. The Greek world faces serious threats from Turkey, including Ankara’s territorial claims on the Greek islands and the continental shelf.

The Greek world does not need the schism and its aftereffects. The Ecumenical Patriarch needs to settle this schism by convening a Pan Orthodox Council that would rule on the Ukrainian situation. It should be remembered that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo encouraged Patriarch Bartholomew to invade the Russian Church’s territory in Ukraine.

What exactly has the State Department done to save Hagia Sophia or the Christ the Savior Church in Chora? It should be remembered that the State Department under John Foster Dulles in 1955 failed to even condemn the anti Greek pogroms in Constantinople that set the stage for the destruction of the Patriarchate’s flock. The State Department has done nothing for the theological school of Halki either.

The Greek world is suffering the loss of important shrines in Constantinople. Both Greece and Cyprus are are the targets of Turkish aggression. The Greek world needs to remain on friendly terms with America, Russia, Europe, and other parties in order to resist Turkey.

Resolving the Ukrainian Church dispute according to the ruling of a pan Orthodox synod will remove a spiritual crisis from the Greek Churches and restore their relations with the Russian Church and the other local Churches. It is time to end this Ukrainian Church crisis and for Constantinople’s “supporters” to stop with the cheap shots at the Russian Church.

Categories
faith

Orthodoxy and the Democrats

The Greek Orthodox Archbishop of America appeared at the Democratic National Convention and offered a prayer for Presidential nominee Joe Biden. On the one hand, we are taught by the Church to pray for our leaders irrespective of ideology or party affiliation. During the divine liturgy bishops and priests always pray for the head of state irrespective of political affiliation.

It is one thing to pray for our President whoever it may be in Church services. It is quite another to pray for a Presidential candidate who represents a political party that is fervently anti Christian. One could argue he is simply offering up a blessing to a man who may be elected to the Presidency. We will see if the Archbishop will be at the Republican National Convention to offer up prayers for the current President.

Greek Orthodox faithful in America should be concerned about the Democratic Party. The Democrats are rabidly anti Christian. Groups such as “antifa” and “black lives matter” make up a huge part of the base of the Democratic Party. The burning of Bibles by these groups should be condemned by all Orthodox faithful. The Archbishop could have inspired confidence had he taken a brief moment to condemn the burning of Bibles.

In addition to the sacrilege against the holy scriptures, the Democratic Party supports infanticide, sex changes for children, and many of its officials who serve as Mayors throughout America ordered the Police to stand down as rioters destroyed public and private property. The base of the Democratic Party incited hatred of the Police and demands the “defunding” or outright abolition of the Police.

Such a disturbing agenda should be a cause for protests by the Greek Orthodox hierarchy. There are other reasons to be concerned about a Biden administration. As Senator, Joe Biden supported the bombing of Serbia and the seizure of Kosovo from Orthodox Serbia. Serbs became the victims of ethnic cleansing following the withdrawal of Serbian troops from Kosovo and it should not be forgotten that NATO bombed Serbia on Orthodox Easter.

As Vice President, Joe Biden supported the destruction of Syria which led to the near genocide of the Orthodox (and other) Christians of Syria. Joe Biden was part of an administration that included neoconservatives such as Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt who instigated the conflict in Ukraine in 2014. In addition, Joe Biden has made statements supporting the “autocephaly” of the pseudo “church” in Ukraine, a matter he has no business commenting on.

On Greek matters, Joe Biden has done nothing for Greece. His advocacy as Vice President in the Obama administration led to the refugee crisis from Syria which flooded the Greek islands with refugees. At no point, did the Obama administration reverse Washington’s traditional pro Turkish policies. There is no shortage of reasons why Greek Orthodox should be distrustful of the Democratic Party.

Perhaps his Eminence was just bestowing a friendly blessing. In that case it will be well and good if his Eminence is present at the Republican National Convention to ensure that the Archdiocese is not becoming involved in partisan politics.

Categories
political

Erdogan’s genocidal ambitions

Turkish President Erdogan has criticized the Republican People’s Party for “losing” the Greek islands that are off the Turkish coast. The Republican People’s Party was the party that was founded by the murderous dictator and general Mustafa Kemal Pasha. Kemal was responsible for conquering territories that had been lost to the Ottoman Empire in 1918 including Constantinople (occupied by the western powers), Smyrna and other lands liberated by Greece, and independent Armenia.

The forcible reconquest of all these territories was carried out through genocide and ethnic cleansing. Only with the deliberate murder and forcible expulsions of the native Christian populations was it possible for Kemal to reclaim these lands for the successor state to the Ottoman Empire that he subsequently created. At the Lausanne Conference of 1923, Kemal practically dictated the terms of “peace” between his own movement and Greece.

Despite Kemal’s conquests of all these territories, Turks like Erdogan remain unsatisfied. Erdogan openly covets the Greek islands that are near the Asia minor coast despite the fact that the populations of these islands are overwhelmingly Greek and have been Hellenic for many centuries before the Turks ever showed up. Turkey today could only take these islands through genocide and ethnic cleansing.

Erdogan would not be the only Turkish leader to advocate genocide and territorial expansionism at the expense of Greece. Kemal of course is the most notorious practitioner of genocide (along with the Young Turks who preceded him). Another leader of the Republican People’s Party, Bulent Ecevit ordered the invasion and occupation of Cyprus in 1974 which led to the ethnic cleansing of 200,000 Greek Cypriots. For Erdogan, Kemal and Ecevit were much too soft on the Greeks.

It is very clear that Erdogan is a psychopath and an extreme narcissist. Greece and Cyprus need to be fully prepared to defend themselves and their native populations from Turkish aggression. Fortunately, Prime Minister Mitsotakis seems to be prepared for the difficult road ahead. For the first time in decades, Greece has a government that is competent in both foreign affairs and in domestic affairs.

The successful handing of the coronavirus epidemic in Greece has won Greece good will and the Prime Minister has a good reputation with a good deal of political and diplomatic sophistication (in contrast to his predecessor). Mitsotakis has been standing up to Turkey over the matter of the continental shelf and has won the backing of Egypt, Israel, the European Union, and the United States (although it is unclear how far American support will go). Mitsotakis could become another Venizelos if he continues to succeed in building up international support against Erdogan’s genocidal ambitions.

Categories
books

The Dictators

Book Reviews

Stalin Waiting for Hitler 1929-1941 by Stephen Kotkin. Penguin Press. 2017

Hitler by Peter Longerich. Oxford University Press. 2019.

The Stalin book is the second volume of a three volume set published by scholar Stephen Kotkin. Both the Kotkin book and the Hitler biography by Peter Longerich are the products of superb research. Both texts are over nine hundred pages and the footnotes and bibliography are very lengthy and impressive.

We live in an age where academic institutions have been corrupted by ideology. It is refreshing to see that there are real historians and scholars at work spending years compiling information and research to publish biographies of the two most notorious dictators of the twentieth century. Reexamining the totalitarian states of the twentieth century is of extreme importance in our day as free speech and independent thought have been challenged in both academia and much of the news media.

The Stalin book is a detailed recollection of the political rule and foreign and domestic policies of Joseph Stalin. There is a good deal of material on the great terror of the 1930’s. Stalin was the practitioner of a true totalitarian regime in which the control of the government over its citizenry was total. Under Stalin, no citizen was safe. Even ideological allies of the dictator were not safe and the leadership of the communist party, the red army, the NKVD (secret police) and the foreign ministry were subjected to purges which resulted in the mass murders of its leaders for no logical reason.

Stalin murdered most of his army officers. This would have serious consequences. Unbelievably, Stalin ignored warnings not only from the British and Americans that Hitler was planning an invasion of Russia, but he ignored warnings from his own spies that were working in Germany. Spies and Soviet diplomats in Germany warned the dictator that Germany would invade.

Even the gathering German troops near the Soviet border was not enough to convince Stalin that Hitler was planning an invasion. Military leaders and others thoroughly convinced the Nazis planned to invade had to choose their words carefully in trying to persuade Stalin that Germany was going to invade. Any wrong words could lead to that individuals death.

The Longerich biography of Hitler is one of the best. Not quite as good as the two volume biography by Ian Kershaw (which is still the best biography of Hitler) but it is excellent and thoroughly details Hitlers rise to power and the evolution of German domestic and foreign policies under Hitler. A superb piece of work.

Recent events have demonstrated the totalitarian mindset of political extremists within the United States. Academic institutions need to get out of the business of promoting “social change” and “diversity” and return to the business of educating students. The two aforementioned biographies are necessary reading for students in the social sciences.

These books are crucial to the study of history and how the ideologies which their subjects adhered to corrupted politics and destroyed their societies. These biographies are a reminder of the importance of moderation in politics and the need to reject all extremisms from the far left to the far right.

Categories
political

Hagia Sophia Diaries 15

The Turkish government lied to the world when it declared that the mosaics of Hagia Sophia would be protected. The iconography is covered up when Islamic prayers are not being said. The upper gallery of Hagia Sophia has also been closed to tourists.

This is very likely a first step to permanently cover or erase the iconography. The flags of the Taliban and Hamas have both been raised inside Hagia Sophia. The most extreme and fanatical elements in the Muslim world are behind Erdogan. Erdogan has lost the support of much of the native Turkish population but he has made Islamists throughout the world very happy.

After writing one letter to Turkish officials, UNESCO has gone back to sleep and is ignoring the continued desecration of Hagia Sophia. The international media is continuing to write about Hagia Sophia but the protests from the academics have gone silent once again. All the worst fears about Hagia Sophia are being realized.

The covering up of Christian iconography can be construed as disrespectful, if not blasphemous. Erdogan has failed his own citizens by causing the further spread of coronavirus but he is a hero for the world’s Jihadists. When it comes to the future of the mosaics of Hagia Sophia the Jihadists are likely to have more influence on Erdogan than Turkish critics of the conversion of Hagia Sophia or foreign governments who have criticized the conversion.

Categories
political

Hagia Sophia Diaries 14

The blowback from Turkish President Erdogan’s decision to turn Hagia Sophia into a Mosque continues. Articles and commentaries continue to be published daily throughout the world criticizing Erdogan’s decision. Many of the commentaries are written by Turkish dissidents who are appalled by collapse of Turkish secularism and the growing authoritarianism of the Erdogan government in recent years.

The conversion of Hagia Sophia into a Mosque was supposed to be a symbol of neo-Ottoman triumphalism. The Erdogan government was supposed to celebrate the victory over the secularism of Mustafa Kemal as well as the conquest of the capital of Eastern Christianity by the Ottoman Turks. It is now known that a Muslim cleric who lead prayers in Hagia Sophia died of a heart attack. Furthermore, three thousand people in or outside Hagia Sophia were infected with the corona virus.

The conversion of Hagia Sophia was an initial public relations disaster. The health threat as a result of the huge gathering at the site is an even bigger disaster. President Erdogan himself can be blamed for spreading the corona virus among his own population. This is an act of blatant incompetence and moral failure.

There has been speculation that the whole Hagia Sophia affair was intended to bolster Erdogan’s popularity. If so, this attempt was a spectacular failure. The Turkish population will not be thrilled with the fact that a dangerous disease has spread because of the narcissism and arrogance of the President.

This could be a significant moment for Turkey. Hagia Sophia could become the cause of the downfall of the Erdogan regime. That is very unlikely, but possible. Leaving aside the Turkish President causing his own citizens to become infected with corona virus, the regime had been planting the seeds of its own destruction by interfering with Hagia Sophia.

The Erdogan regime has expansionist tendencies. Ankara tried (and failed) to expand its influence in Syria. It has more successfully established influence in Libya. The Hagia Sophia debacle has had very minimal benefits (that have been heavily outweighed by the international backlash) in terms of establishing closer Turkish ties with Iran, Hamas, and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Erdogan has territorial claims on the Greek islands. The international climate was already critical of Turkish influence and expansionism even before the Hagia Sophia debacle. Erdogan’s stunt succeeded in bringing unwanted attention to Turkey. As such, any Turkish expansionism has been preceded by an awakening throughout the world that Turkey is a menace and a danger.

Theological interpretations aside, Hagia Sophia has become a curse for the Turkish leadership. The political and diplomatic fallout has led to maximum media coverage throughout the world. Attention has been brought down on both Turkish expansionistic activity and the domestic abuse of political dissidents and minorities.

Whatever happens in Turkey, the debacle at Hagia Sophia will have seriously damaged the Erdogan regime.

Categories
faith political

Hagia Sophia Diaries 13

Greece and Egypt recently signed an EEZ agreement which strengthens Greece against Turkey. Turkey states that the agreement between Greece and Egypt is non existent. Greek diplomacy has come a long way under Prime Minister Mitsotakis which is standing up to Turkish aggression.

More welcome news is that the government of Egypt has condemned the conversion of Hagia Sophia into a Mosque. Furthermore, the Egyptian Prime Minister visited the Greek Orthodox Monastery of Saint Catherine at Sinai and was awarded with the Order of Saint Catherine. The Egyptian government announced that it was going to spend the equivalent of $2.5 million for the restoration of the Monastery.

A few years ago, the Monastery came under attack from Islamic State militants. Four Egyptian police officers were killed and one was injured in the line of duty in protecting Christian Monks from the Islamic State. The attitude of Egypt toward the Monastery of Saint Catherine is one that is truly enlightened and Greek Orthodox Christians everywhere should be grateful.

The Monastery itself was built under the auspices of Saint Justinian the Great of Constantinople who also presided over the construction of Hagia Sophia. Saint Catherine’s was originally named for the transfiguration of Christ but in later centuries was renamed after the relics of Saint Catherine were discovered at that site.

The Monastery is also built on the site of the burning bush through which God spoke to Moses. It is one of the holiest places in Christendom. The Monastery grounds also include a Mosque so that Muslims may also pray. Sinai is also holy to Muslims and Jews who also regard Moses as a great prophet.

The Coptic Christians of Egypt have long been persecuted in Egypt by fanatical Islamists. Hopefully, the Egyptian government’s fight against Islamic terrorists will secure the rights and the future of the Coptic Christians in Egypt.

In other news, the Turkish cleric who led prayers in Hagia Sophia died of a heart attack.